Griffith's ED Chapter 4 Clarification (Bound Charges)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason Williams
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
Jason Williams
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm having an issue with the equation that Griffith uses to derive the field of a polarized object. In Chapter 4, Section 2.1, he starts off with equation 4.8 with the 'script r' to denote the distance between a point outside the distribution P (and the origin) and the dipole (and the origin). He references equation 3.99 to 'derive' this, but equation 3.99 is the field from a dipole and only depends on the distance from the origin to the point P. I don't quite understand how he makes this jump.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he's using script r to denote distance from the dipole to the point in question because he's no longer dealing with distances far from the dipole where r and script r are basically equivalent.
 
  • Like
Likes Jason Williams
Okay that's what I figured, but is it fair just to make that substitution? Like why not use the regular equation for the potential?
 
I mean they're equivalent except for the definition of distance that you use. Technically the one with script r is more correct I think, but for distances far from the dipole you approximate with r.

The equation is an approximation anyway, but there are orders of correctness I guess.
 
  • Like
Likes Jason Williams
Okay cool, got it. Thanks so much!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top