- #1
Jim Kata
- 197
- 6
Say you have [tex]exp{(\omega)}[/tex] and [tex]\omega[/tex] has a simple pole show that
[tex]exp{(\omega)}=exp{(F+)}z^{-1}exp{(F-)}[/tex] where F+ is holomorphic and F- is antiholomorphic. My basic thought is if [tex]\omega[/tex] has a simple pole then [tex]\omega z[/tex] is holomorphic and on the punctured disk it can be represented by a Laurant series. The problem is that I'm missing a factor of log on z.
[tex]exp{(\omega)}=exp{(F+)}z^{-1}exp{(F-)}[/tex] where F+ is holomorphic and F- is antiholomorphic. My basic thought is if [tex]\omega[/tex] has a simple pole then [tex]\omega z[/tex] is holomorphic and on the punctured disk it can be represented by a Laurant series. The problem is that I'm missing a factor of log on z.