Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Grothendieck decompostion simple example

  1. Jul 30, 2011 #1
    Say you have [tex]exp{(\omega)}[/tex] and [tex]\omega[/tex] has a simple pole show that
    [tex]exp{(\omega)}=exp{(F+)}z^{-1}exp{(F-)}[/tex] where F+ is holomorphic and F- is antiholomorphic. My basic thought is if [tex]\omega[/tex] has a simple pole then [tex]\omega z[/tex] is holomorphic and on the punctured disk it can be represented by a Laurant series. The problem is that I'm missing a factor of log on z.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 10, 2011 #2
    That can't be right - consider w=1/z, so exp(w) has an essential singularity at z=0 and thus hits almost every value in a neighbourhood of 0. But if F+ and F- are holomorphic and antiholomorphic then exp(F+) and exp(F-) would be close to 1 near z=0, which means that |exp(F+)*exp(F-)/z| is bounded from below near z=0.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Loading...
Similar Threads for Grothendieck decompostion simple
I Semi-simple Lie algebra
I Projective Representations: a simple example