Say you have [tex]exp{(\omega)}[/tex] and [tex]\omega[/tex] has a simple pole show that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]exp{(\omega)}=exp{(F+)}z^{-1}exp{(F-)}[/tex] where F+ is holomorphic and F- is antiholomorphic. My basic thought is if [tex]\omega[/tex] has a simple pole then [tex]\omega z[/tex] is holomorphic and on the punctured disk it can be represented by a Laurant series. The problem is that I'm missing a factor of log on z.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Grothendieck decompostion simple example

Loading...

Similar Threads for Grothendieck decompostion simple |
---|

I Semi-simple Lie algebra |

I Projective Representations: a simple example |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**