Ground state of hamonic oscilator

naima
Gold Member
Messages
936
Reaction score
54
When i take a coherent state ##|\alpha>## if ##\alpha -> 0## then the limit is the Fock state for n = 0. so ##|n = 0> = |\alpha = 0>##
The problem is that they seem to have different http://www.iqst.ca/quantech/wiggalery.php:
Where is the error?
Thanks.

Edit sorry, in the link the W function is for a (n = 1) Fock state. So no more problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your question. Among other definitions, you can define a coherent state of a given mode as an eigenvector of the corresponding annihilation operator
$$\hat{a} |\alpha \rangle=\alpha |\alpha \rangle,$$
where ##\alpha \in \mathbb{C}##. For ##\alpha=0## that's the definition of the "vacuum" (absence of the considered mode). Thus also the vacuum is a special coherent state.
 
I had in mind the fact that for an integer ##\alpha## the Fock state ##|\alpha>## is just one of the terms of the serie of the coherenet state ##|\alpha>##.
I did not saw that for 0 the serie has only one term.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top