Ground State Symmetry of Single Electron w/ Non-Interacting 2nd Electron

AI Thread Summary
In a symmetrical potential, the ground state wavefunction of a single electron is symmetric due to its lowest average energy configuration, which minimizes kinetic energy by having a flatter slope. When a second non-interacting electron is added, it shares the same wavefunction as the first because both electrons occupy the same spatial state, respecting the symmetry of the potential. The discussion assumes a one-dimensional scenario, where the Schrödinger equation has been solved to find bound states. The lowest energy state available for the second electron remains the ground state, considering its spin-1/2 nature. Thus, both electrons can occupy the same symmetric ground state wavefunction in this configuration.
positron
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
for a symmetrical potential with one electron, i know that the wavefunctions are symmetric or antisymmetric. for the ground state why is the wavefunction symmetric?

Also, if you add a second electron that is non-interacting, (why) does it have the same wavefunction as the first electron?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume we are talking 1d here? So you've solved the 1d Schrodinger equation and have obtained the bound states of the system, right? You've put your first electron into the ground state, now what is the lowest energy single particle state available to the next electron? (Hint: the electron has spin 1/2)
 
Physics Monkey said:
I assume we are talking 1d here? So you've solved the 1d Schrodinger equation and have obtained the bound states of the system, right? You've put your first electron into the ground state, now what is the lowest energy single particle state available to the next electron? (Hint: the electron has spin 1/2)

Yes, the problem is in 1-D. The potential is a general symmetric potential, so we don't know necessarily have an actual analytical solution to Schrodinger equation. So how do we know the ground state must be symmetric, and that if we put another electron in the potential, it has the same wave function?
 
positron said:
for a symmetrical potential with one electron, i know that the wavefunctions are symmetric or antisymmetric. for the ground state why is the wavefunction symmetric?

An intuitive explanation:

It's because the ground state has the smallest average energy. Energy in QM comes from two places, potential energy and kinetic energy. If you look at the form of the KE operator you will see that KE is smallest when your wave function slope is least (more flat). So the ground state only has one hump. That is, the more humps you got the more you have to go up and down and the higher the slopes.

Carl
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top