Grounding a Circuit - Electronics Lab Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter StonieJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Grounding
AI Thread Summary
In the electronics lab, a simple circuit with three resistors and a battery was grounded by connecting a wire from a resistor to a metal bolt on a water pipe. This grounding did not alter any recorded values, which was confirmed by the TA as expected. The water pipe did not complete the circuit, acting as an open circuit and preventing current flow. Thus, the grounding provided no significant impact on the circuit's behavior or measurements. Grounding is crucial for accurate circuit functioning, but in this instance, it was ineffective.
StonieJ
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
In a recent electronics lab, we designed a simple circuit consisting of only three resistors and a battery. After recording all the relevant data for the system (I, V drop, R, etc), we then grounded it by attaching a wire from one of the resistors to a metal bolt attached to a nearby water pipe. Doing so caused none of our values to change, which the TA said was expected. I'm assuming this is because the water pipe never fed back into the circuit meaning the loop wasn't complete (i.e. the wire from the circuit to the pipe was essentially "dangling" out from our circuit).

Basically, I just wanted to check to make sure this was a valid assumption.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StonieJ said:
In a recent electronics lab, we designed a simple circuit consisting of only three resistors and a battery. After recording all the relevant data for the system (I, V drop, R, etc), we then grounded it by attaching a wire from one of the resistors to a metal bolt attached to a nearby water pipe. Doing so caused none of our values to change, which the TA said was expected. I'm assuming this is because the water pipe never fed back into the circuit meaning the loop wasn't complete (i.e. the wire from the circuit to the pipe was essentially "dangling" out from our circuit).

Basically, I just wanted to check to make sure this was a valid assumption.

Yes, you're right.
 


Yes, your assumption is correct. Grounding a circuit means providing a reference point for the circuit's voltage. In this case, the water pipe was not connected to the circuit in a way that would allow for the flow of current, so it did not affect the circuit's behavior. The wire from the circuit to the pipe was essentially acting as an open circuit, meaning there was no complete loop for the current to flow through. Therefore, the values for current, voltage, and resistance remained the same as if the circuit was not grounded. Overall, grounding a circuit is an important step in ensuring accurate measurements and proper functioning of the circuit, but in this particular case, it did not have any significant impact.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top