Grouping Elements: Making m Groups of n Elements w/ t Uses

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaleidoscope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Grouping
kaleidoscope
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
How many groups size m can you make from n elements (m<n) such that each element is used the same number of times t (t>0)?

For instance, if you have 8 teams and group them in triplets, how many triplets do you need so that each team plays the same number of times?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kaleidoscope said:
How many groups size m can you make from n elements (m<n) such that each element is used the same number of times t (t>0)?

Why wouldn't this be infinite? If repetition is allowed, you can make n groups, each containing m repetitions of the nth element. You can also make 2n groups (so 2 groups contain repetitions of the same element), or 3n, or 4n...

For instance, if you have 8 teams and group them in triplets, how many triplets do you need so that each team plays the same number of times?

Would (1,1,1),(2,2,2),(3,3,3)...(8,8,8) be valid? Of course you can switch the numbers around; each team just needs to play 3 times.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top