Guidance in learning Particle Physics

AI Thread Summary
To start self-learning particle physics, a solid foundation in quantum mechanics and abstract algebra is essential. The individual has completed undergraduate courses in quantum mechanics and abstract algebra, and plans to study Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" while concurrently learning Lie Algebra. Recommendations for further reading include key quantum field theory (QFT) textbooks such as Srednicki, Peskin & Schroeder, and Zee, with Srednicki being noted for its accessibility. Understanding contour integration is also advised as it is relevant to QFT. For Lie Algebra, suggested texts include "Lie Algebras in Particle Physics" by Howard Georgi and "An Introduction to Gauge Theories and Modern Particle Physics" by Leader & Predazzi. Overall, a structured approach to QFT is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of particle physics.
Fizicks1
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I want to start self-learning particle physics, and was wondering if any of you can give me some pointers as to what to do in terms of books to read, maths to learn, etc.

Some background: I have taken undergrad level quantum mechanics 1 and 2 (completed Griffiths), and also a course on abstract algebra (basic group theory + intro to rings and fields).

My current plan for the short term: I plan to self-study from Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" (heard great things about it), and also concurrently self-study Lie Algebra this summer.

I then plan to move on to slightly more formal books on particle physics (any recommendations?).

Any kind of input is welcomed and much appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your background sounds good. Have you taken an undergraduate electromagnetism course? That will be helpful at some point.

If what you really want to learn is quantum field theory, Griffiths's book gives some flavor of this but doesn't derive everything from first principles and will probably leave you wondering, for example, where the Feynman rules come from. Spending some time with Griffiths is probably a good idea, but only as a way of preparing for "real" QFT.

Then some standard standard QFT textbooks are by Srednicki; Peskin & Schroeder; and Zee. I like Srednicki's book as a thorough introduction which works everything out in the simplest possible QFT before moving on to QED. Peskin & Schroeder is also very thorough but I found it less accessible because it dives directly into QED. Zee is not good as a main book to learn from, but has some useful insights. Having more than one QFT book is a good idea.

Lie algebras are an excellent topic to study alongside QFT.

If you haven't already, you'll want to learn a bit about the technique of solving integrals by contour integration. But it's not too complicated and you can just wait until you run into it in a textbook and then Google will turn up plenty of useful sites that will teach you about it.
 
Thanks The_Duck for the response. I have indeed taken an EM course, in fact I'm finishing the second half of Griffiths this semester in my second undergrad EM course.

Also luckily I do have some experience with contour integration, from a course on mathematical methods in physics I took last year.

Also thanks for the book recommendations. Any recommendations on Lie Algebra books?

Thanks again.

Though I must say, with over a hundred views and only 1 reply, I am quite disappointed.
 
The_Duck recommendations are good, but keep in mind that they have to do with quantum field theory. It is probably indispensable to spend some time learning quantum field theory on its own if you want to study particle physics. I post some recommendations on particle physics.

"Lie Algebras in Particle Physics : from Isospin To Unified Theories"
Howard Georgi
Frontiers in Physics, Westview Press

"An introduction to Gauge Theories and Modern Particle Physics"
Leader & Predazzi
Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology

"Dynamics of the Standard Model"
Donoghue, Golowich & Holstein
CUP

"Gauge Field Theories"
Stefan Pokorski
CUP

Particle Data Group review (2012)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
Fizicks1 said:
Though I must say, with over a hundred views and only 1 reply, I am quite disappointed.

Sometimes you actually get what you pay for. :wink:
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top