• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Gyroscope precession derivation

  • Thread starter bman!!
  • Start date
  • #1
29
0
alrite im new on this forum....just discovered it...pretty awesome

ok, im looking over notes from a classical physics course i did, and ive just covered rigid bodies, and literally just got through the inertia tensor, principal axes and all that good stuff.

theres a step in the gyroscope precession, that is mathematically very simple, but im just having a brain fart and it completely eludes me:

body is roating about a principle axis such that w (rotation vector) is equal to we(3) where e(3) is the principle axes of the body vector (presumably the vector that is perpendicular to the face of the spinning disk)

this means ang mom J=I(3)we(3) where I(3) is the corresponding moment of inertia.

thus the differential of this quantity to get the torque is therefore = 0 as w is constant.

i understand this.....but then

small force F is applied somewhere along this axis at r, this force is perpendicular to w. the body then aquires small component of angular v perpendicular to its axis, new equation of motion, the torque ;J(dot) = r x F.

i also understand this bit, but then this next simple step completely throws me;

if the force is small, the new angular velocity component will be small compared to the angular velocity of the orignal rotation,we can then ignore angular momentum components normal to the axis and therefore write

J(dot) = I(3)w(dot) = r x F

i just do not understand this bit.

if the notation comfuses ive attached the source notes from where im revising. the section is on pages 17-18, the notes are good, but i have to say the inertai tensor bit was somewhat lacking in explanation for my taste.

i realise forum etiquette requires i look at old posts and all that, but this quite specific question about a step in a derviation that i simply do not get.

any help appreciated.

cheers
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
29
0
id also like to add, i didnt think this was quite homework and coursework, so i posted it here, cos it was difficulty in conceptualising rather than raw calculation difficulty
 
  • #3
29
0
uhhhh brain fart, i think i just got it.....

i feel like a retard.
 

Related Threads for: Gyroscope precession derivation

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
979
Top