Half Life of radioactive needle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time required for the radioactive isotope 222 Rn to decay to half of its original activity, given its half-life of 3.83 days and its secular equilibrium with 226 Ra. Participants explore the equations governing radioactive decay, particularly focusing on the relationship between the parent and daughter isotopes. The key point is that in secular equilibrium, the activity of the daughter (222 Rn) is approximately equal to that of the parent (226 Ra), leading to a proportional relationship between their quantities. The conversation emphasizes deriving expressions for the quantities involved and solving for time using the decay equations. The overall goal is to accurately determine the decay time for 222 Rn based on these principles.
completenoob
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A radioactive needle contains 222 Rn (t1/2=3.83 d) in secular equilibrium with 226 Ra(t1/2=1600 a). How long does is it required for 222 Rn to decay to half of its original activity?

Homework Equations


A(t) = -\frac{dN(t)}{dt} = \lambda N(t)

The Attempt at a Solution


Secular equilibrium occurs when the activity of the daughter is approximately equal to the activity of the parent.
Do I just work the above equation for the Daughter Rn?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A_a(t) = \frac{dN_a(t)}{dt} = -\lambda_a N_a(t)
and

A_b(t) = \frac{dN_b(t)}{dt} = \lambda_a N_a(t) - \lambda_b N_b(t)

one must derive an expression for Nb

Has one not done so in class or is there not such a derivation in one's textbook?


Secular equilibrium occurs when dNb/dt = 0, i.e. the activity of b is determined by the decay of a, i.e. Nb is proportional to Na.

N_b = \frac{\lambda_a}{\lambda_b} N_a

Reference - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/cgi/reprint/20/2/162.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_equilibrium
 
Ok. So
<br /> N_a(t)=N_a(0) e^{-\lambda t} <br />

Then set
<br /> N_b \longrightarrow \frac{1}{2}N_b <br />

Plug that into
<br /> N_b = \frac{\lambda_a}{\lambda_b} N_a<br />
And solve for t. Right?
 
Correction, I should take the derivative of
N_b(t) = \frac{\lambda_a}{lambda_b} N_a(0) e^{-\lambda_a t}
Put in \frac{A(t)}{2} equal to that stuff
Then solve for t correct?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top