Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity: Understanding H Y = E Y and T Y = G Y

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rothiemurchus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Hamiltonian
Rothiemurchus
Messages
203
Reaction score
1
Generally we write H Y = E Y in quantum mechanics.

Would it make any sense to use T ( stress-energy tensor) from general relativity and G (curvature) to write :

T Y = G Y
 
Physics news on Phys.org
T Y = G Y

chuckle
 
What would you call Y in that case ?
 
Rothiemurchus said:
Generally we write H Y = E Y in quantum mechanics.

Would it make any sense to use T ( stress-energy tensor) from general relativity and G (curvature) to write :

T Y = G Y


Well, this is not what people do, no. Because G already contains derivatives of the metric, so T=G is already a differential equation. So it's the metric itself which is treated as a quantum field (so roughly speaking, it is treated like the psi of qm) and the equation is kept as T=G.

Pat
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top