Hamiltonian describing energy transfer to bloch Electron from EM field

dkin
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I've a hamiltonian that describes the coupling of electrons in a crystal (bloch electrons) to an EM field described by a vector potential A

<br /> \begin{equation}<br /> \mathscr{H} = \frac{e}{mc}\left[\mathbf{p}(-\mathbf{k}) \cdot<br /> \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{k}, \omega)\right]<br /> \end{equation}<br />

\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{k}, \omega) is the amplitude of the Fourier component of the vector potential for the incident photons with wavevector \mathbf{k} and frequency \omega.

\mathbf{p}(-\mathbf{k}) is the many particle momentum operator for the electrons with wavevector -\mathbf{k}

-----

Here are my questions if anyone would be so kind as to help.

1) How does this equation result in an energy value??

2) Can electrons with wave vector -k only couple with photons of wave vector k?? If so why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3) Is the vector potential responsible for coupling the electrons and photons together or is it just a measure of the amplitude of the incident photons?Thanks in advance.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top