Hamiltonian for 2 Particles with Angular Momentum

silmaril89
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Hamiltonian for two particles with angular momentum j_1 and j_2 is given by:
\hat{H} = \epsilon [ \hat{\bf{j}}_1 \times \hat{\bf{j}}_2 ]^2,
where \epsilon is a constant. Show that the Hamiltonian is a Hermitian scalar and find the energy spectrum.

Homework Equations



Not really any specific to put here.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried simplifying the Hamiltonian using suffix notation with the Einstein summation convention. I was able to get the following:
\hat{H} = \epsilon [( \hat{\bf{j}}_1 \cdot \hat{\bf{j}}_1) ( \hat{\bf{j}}_2 \cdot \hat{\bf{j}}_2) - \hat{j}_{1 i} ( \hat{\bf{j}}_2 \cdot \hat{\bf{j}}_1) \hat{j}_{2 i}].

Now I have the problem that since \hat{j}_{2i} doesn't commute with ( \hat{\bf{j}}_2 \cdot \hat{\bf{j}}_1), I can't simplify the Hamiltonian further. I'm not sure what my next steps should be.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is quite a common trick for this kinds of things, you can always express the dot product of two angular momentums as

J_1\cdot\J_2=\frac{1}{2}((J_1+J_2)^2-J_1^2-J_2^2)

The operators on the right hand side are easy to handle.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top