Hard potential energy function question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the force on a particle from a given potential energy function, V(x) = (ka^2)/((x^2)+(a^2)). Participants clarify that potential energy is not simply the product of potential and mass, and that charge is not necessary for expressing force in this context. The correct approach involves using calculus, specifically taking the gradient or derivative of the potential function. The formula for force is established as F = -dV(x)/dx. The conversation concludes with a confirmation that understanding the gradient is key to solving the problem effectively.
Lucy Yeats
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Potential energy function A particle of mass m, starting from x = −∞, approaches
a force region whose potential is given by
V (x) =(ka^2)/((x^2)+(a^2))
where V0 > 0 and a are constants.
(a) Derive an expression for the force on the particle as a function of

Homework Equations



E=F/Q, V=W/Q, E=V/d

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to substitute it into the equations above, but it didn't work. A friend thought the answer involved calculus, but I'm not sure where to start. Any hints would be much appreciated...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it correct that potential x mass = potential energy?
 
Do I need to introduce a constant for the charge, of can I express F without this? Help, please! Thanks! :-)
 
Lucy Yeats said:
Is it correct that potential x mass = potential energy?

No.

Check your thread which directly asks this question.
 
Lucy Yeats said:
Do I need to introduce a constant for the charge, [STRIKE]of[/STRIKE] or can I express F without this? Help, please! Thanks! :-)

You don't need the charge.

You can express F without introducing a charge.

Do you know how to take the gradient?

F = - V .

Otherwise, F = - dV(x)/dx .
 
Thanks SammyS, you post about the gradient answers the question perfectly!

:-)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top