Harmonic Oscillator problem

saim_
Messages
135
Reaction score
1
The book derives the wavefunction for the ground state of a harmonic oscillator. It's found to be a Gaussian with dispersion l = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}. The probability distribution for momentum is found to be Gaussian as well with dispersion \sigma_{p} = \frac{\hbar}{2l}. The following is the line of the book that I'm having trouble understanding:

"By inserting x = l and p = \sigma_{p} in the Hamiltonian, we obtain estimates of the typical kinetic and potential energies of the particle when it’s in its ground state."

where the Hamiltonian of course is \frac{1}{2m}\{ p^{2} + \left( m \omega x \right)^{2} \}.

Problem is: Why does inserting dispersion or variance produce estimates for typical values? Shouldn't this happen when we insert expectation or mean values?

The book goes on to say that minimizing the Hamiltonian after substituting the expressions for the dispersion values, as described above, under the constraint that their product will remain less than or equal to \frac{\hbar}{2} (uncertainty principle), will produce the appropriate value of energy for ground-state. Why does this happen? Why is inserting dispersion values producing these correct solutions? But I think this confusion emerges from same question as before.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
variance IS by definition the expectation value of x^2
so by inserting variance you are indeed getting what you should get
 
saim_ said:
The book derives the wavefunction for the ground state of a harmonic oscillator. It's found to be a Gaussian with dispersion l = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}. The probability distribution for momentum is found to be Gaussian as well with dispersion \sigma_{p} = \frac{\hbar}{2l}. The following is the line of the book that I'm having trouble understanding:

"By inserting x = l and p = \sigma_{p} in the Hamiltonian, we obtain estimates of the typical kinetic and potential energies of the particle when it’s in its ground state."

where the Hamiltonian of course is \frac{1}{2m}\{ p^{2} + \left( m \omega x \right)^{2} \}.

Problem is: Why does inserting dispersion or variance produce estimates for typical values? Shouldn't this happen when we insert expectation or mean values?

The book goes on to say that minimizing the Hamiltonian after substituting the expressions for the dispersion values, as described above, under the constraint that their product will remain less than or equal to \frac{\hbar}{2} (uncertainty principle), will produce the appropriate value of energy for ground-state. Why does this happen? Why is inserting dispersion values producing these correct solutions? But I think this confusion emerges from same question as before.

Because the H of SHO, as you point out consists of p^2 and x^2, so \langle H \rangle consists of \langle p^2 and \langle x^2. Given that it is clear that \langle p \rangle 0 and \langle x \rangle = 0, the expectation of H can be computed from the variant.
 
Oh, yes, right... thanks alot!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top