Harmonic Oscillator: Solving Newton's Second Law

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's Second Law in the context of a vertical mass damper system, specifically analyzing the relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration of the mass as it moves. Participants explore the implications of these relationships and clarify concepts related to motion and forces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the direction of the acceleration vector when the mass is moving downward, noting that the acceleration function appears negative while the mass is descending.
  • Another participant suggests that the upward acceleration vector indicates deceleration as the mass approaches its lowest position, while the velocity vector points downward.
  • A participant questions whether the term (ma(t)) relates to the movement of the mass, expressing uncertainty about predicting movement based solely on the acceleration vector.
  • One participant explains that the velocity vector is tangential to the motion, while the acceleration vector can act in the opposite direction if the object is slowing down.
  • Another participant offers an example of circular motion, highlighting how the acceleration vector can be directed in unexpected ways depending on the motion's nature.
  • A participant acknowledges confusion regarding the relationship between force direction and acceleration, clarifying that acceleration indicates how speed changes rather than the direction of movement itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and confusion regarding the concepts discussed. While some clarify and refine their understanding of the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and force, others express uncertainty about how these concepts apply to their specific scenario.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in their understanding of the dynamics involved, particularly regarding the implications of acceleration direction and its relationship to force and motion. There are unresolved aspects related to the interpretation of acceleration in different contexts.

induing
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hello,

new here and confused about Newton second Law.

given:
vertical mass damper system, position of the mass: x(t)=sin(t)
velocity is: v(t)=cos(t)
acceleration is: a(t)=-sin(t)

function x(t): above x-axis describes position of the mass below the vertical equilibrium point, which (below) is the positive direction of vector x


suppose I look at the movement between t=0 and t=T/4: when the mass is below the vertical equilibrium line and is moving to the ground

when I apply Newton second law (ma(t)) the vector a(t) must point downward because mass is going down, but when I look at the the function a(t) is it negative, which means the vector a(t) is pointing upward (ponting in negative direction)...

I'm off the right track, but don't see my fault..

so if anyone can help, please?

grtz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand this correctly, the acceleration vector should point upwards because, on the way down, the mass is approaching its lowest position and will have zero velocity there. This upward acceleration vector provides the necessary deceleration of the mass. The velocity vector points downward, however.
 
so the term (ma(t)) isn't the vector which is related to the movement of the mass?

i find that rather weird, because ma(t) equals the vector sum of all the (external) forces, so i would pressume that this net force gives the direction...

and if I do understand this correctly, I cannot predict the movement of the mass just by looking at the acceleration vector?

thank you for reply!
grtz
 
The movement of a body is generally represented by the velocity vector, which is always tangential to the motion. For example, if a car was traveling eastwards, the velocity vector would point eastwards.

The acceleration vector, however, acts in the direction opposite to motion if the object is slowing down. In the above example, if the car was traveling eastwards and slowed down to turn a corner,say, the velocity vector points eastwards, but the acceleration vector points westwards. We say the car has a negative acceleration (in my first post deceleration should be replaced with negative acceleration to be more precise). However, in accelerating a car, for example, the velocity and acceleration vectors do point in the same direction. (net force on car is in this direction). [tex]\sum F_x = ma_x[/tex]
 
thanks for the clear and brief explanation!
must have been very confused: force which is needed to give a body certain amount of movement, is indeed the thing which control way the way the body change it's movement

more friction will slow it down down, so decceleration kicks in, but body off course is still moving some time in the same direction.

thank you big time,sir!
grtz
 
Perhaps to give another example, have you ever looked at circular motion? The velocity vector is always tangent to the circle if a body is undergoing circular motion. But the acceleration vector can be in quite unexpected places. If there is no tangential acceleration (that is, constant velocity and uniform circular motion) then the acceleration vector is radially inwards (the body experiences a centripetal acceleration). However, if there is a tangential acceleration, the resultant acceleration vector is the vector sum of the centripetal acc. and tangential acc. and we get a vector that is slightly offset from being directed exactly towards the centre of the circle.
 
yeah I know the dynamics of circular motion, constant velocity or accelerated
the normal (radial) component is needed to change movement of direction and is always presented

if you want a accelerated circular movement (speeding up in a curved road) the tangential vector which produces change in velocity kicks in

acceleration vector then consists of 2 vector.

have been confused with force direction as being the direction of the acceration vector, which just indicates the way the speed is changing an not the movement itself

soon examination of dynamics,
so many thanks again for the quick reply!

grtz
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K