Harmonic Potentials and energy state populations

AI Thread Summary
For a potential energy surface with two minima, A and B, the discussion focuses on determining the relationship between the force constants kA and kB to establish when the higher energy state B becomes more probable at temperature T. The key question is how small kB must be relative to kA for state B to be favored. The lack of responses indicates a need for clarification or deeper exploration of the topic. The inquiry emphasizes the importance of understanding harmonic potentials in statistical mechanics. Engaging with this concept can provide insights into energy state populations in thermodynamic systems.
DanPhysChem
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi All - Let's say I have a potential energy surface with two minima, one higher than the other. We will label the higher minima B and the lower minima A. Each potential well can be approximated as a harmonic potential with force constants kA and kB for wells A and B respectively. How small must kB be in terms of kA in order for that state (higher energy) to be the more likely state at temperature T?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sry to bump my own thread. I'm really dying on this one here, any help is much appreciated.
 
Is anyone out there? I've yet to get a response to anything I've posted on this site :-(
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top