Hartle Gravity - Simple basis vector question

CFDFEAGURU
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Helo all,

I have a very simple question about basis Four-Vectors and Components. In Hartle's book, Gravity, he uses the following equation to show the components of the 4-vector, a

a =a^t{}e(sub t) + a^x{}e(sub x) + a^y{}e(sub y) + a^z{}e(sub z)

Sorry for the half LaTex half something else but I couln't get the subscript LaTex command to work right. All it did was create another superscript.

Here is my question:

The e(subs) are a unit vector so there value should be -1 for the t component and 1 for the x, y, and z components correct?

For example, (this is problem 5.1)

The components of the 4-vector a^\alpha{} are (-2,0,0,1)

Is a timelike, spacelike, or null?

The value of a\alpha = -2(-1) + 0(1) + 0(1) + 1(1) = -1

Since -1 < 0, a is timelike.

Is the above correct ?

Thanks
Matt
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not. If this is special relativity, the basis vectors are just the standard basis vectors of \mathbb R^4. e_0=(1,0,0,0),\ e_1=(0,1,0,0) and so on. If it's general relativity, we're talking about basis vectors for the tangent space, and every coordinate system defines a basis as described here.

To determine if a four-vector u is timelike, null or spacelike, you must check if u^2=g_{\alpha\beta}u^\alpha u^\beta is <0, =0, or >0 respectively. If we're talking about the Minkowski metric with the -+++ convention, you have u^2=-(u^0)^2+(u^1)^2+(u^2)^2+(u^3)^2.
 
Fredrik,

Thanks.

The "unit" vector was causing me the confusion.

So the correct calculation for the value of a is

The value of a = -(-2(-2))+ 0(0) + 0(0) + 1(1) = -3

and a is timelike.

glamotte was also helping me out with this but the "unit" vector was causing me some confusion.

Thanks
Matt
 
It's the correct calculation, but what you're calculating isn't a, it's a2:

a^2=a^T\eta a=-(a^0)^2+(a^1)^2+(a^2)^2+(a^3)^2=(-2)^2+0^2+0^2+1^2=-3&lt;0
 
Yes, sorry for that. I understood it to be a^2, I just didn't show it in my post.

Thanks for the correction.

Matt
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top