Has anyone heard of or read about The Vortex Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory Vortex
AI Thread Summary
Claims are being made that relativity is based on incorrect assumptions about time and is now considered obsolete. The proponents of this new theory lack credible scholarly support, as they have no articles published in reputable journals and provide no formulas or practical examples. They are soliciting funds to share details about their theory, raising skepticism about their legitimacy. Some discussions reference a theory suggesting time as a byproduct of motion, which aligns with previous theories on the topic. Overall, the conversation highlights significant doubts regarding the validity and credibility of the new claims against established physics.
amp
Care to share? They are claiming relativity is based on some wrong assumptions about time, that its obsolete.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got an email about it a few months ago. They probably mined these forums for email addresses.

Lets see. They have a miraculous new discovery which will turn physics on its end. They have no articles in any scholarly journals. Their website gives no formulas or even examples of where their theory would apply, AND they want you to send them money to find out about their "theory".

Yep, sounds like a winner to me.
 
Yeah Enigma, I noticed that...

they also made some claims I've seen sort of reminiscent to a new theory on PF v2 with regard to time being a byproduct of motion.
 
If the vortex theory is right it should be equivalent to the theory of interaction.
You may download essentials of the latter for free at http://www.eugenesavov.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lets agree on right assumptions about time. have you seen my 'CONSTRUCTION OF TIME' in 'ARGUMENTS AGAINST MODERN PHYSICS'. what about it?
 

Thread 'Need help understanding particle physics and quantum physics'

So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
View full post »

Similar threads

A Vortex loop stabilization in SU(N) gauge theory - DBI term approach
Replies
4
Views
197
Saturated steam inside a vortex tube
Replies
11
Views
4K
Some points about a vortex tube
Replies
11
Views
2K
Can Cold Air Be 100% Humid in a Vortex Tube?
Replies
18
Views
4K
Tesla's Vortex (Mathologer Coding Competition)
Replies
2
Views
2K
When the COP of refrigerator is greater or less than 1?
Replies
9
Views
8K
Challenges in Implementing McCormic's Vortex Theory of Propellers
Replies
2
Views
2K
Could Vortexes Enhance Rocket Propulsion Efficiency?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Vortex generators under your racecar question
Replies
5
Views
4K
Fictional Application of Ring-Vortex
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top