Has anyone taken an astronomy class

  • Thread starter Thread starter land_of_ice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Class
AI Thread Summary
Astronomy classes at junior colleges typically cover a broad range of introductory topics, including stars, planets, galaxies, and the big bang, often without heavy math. Courses may include observational techniques and basic stellar classification, but the depth of content is usually superficial. Many students find these classes helpful for deciding on a major, though they may feel unchallenged if they have a background in physics. Higher-level astronomy courses are recommended for those seeking more in-depth knowledge and mathematical rigor. Overall, while introductory classes can be interesting, they often serve as a general overview rather than a comprehensive study of the subject.
land_of_ice
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
what do you learn in an astronomy class, considering taking one , this is not at a university, but at a junior college. Just curious about what topics are covered.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends - there is quite a lot of astronomy to cover!

Assuming this is an intro, none maths heavy sort of course it will probably cover general intro, stars, planets, galaxies, the big bang.
Perhaps steller structure and evolution - nuclear reactions in stars, the HR diagram.

It might also have observing techniques, astronomical coordinate systems, using telescopes etc if they have an observatory.
 
In my astronomy 101 class at a community college, all of the above was covered, though in a very brief, superficial way. The only thing that got even slightly deep was learning how to read and classify stellar spectra.
 
Jack21222 said:
In my astronomy 101 class at a community college, all of the above was covered, though in a very brief, superficial way. The only thing that got even slightly deep was learning how to read and classify stellar spectra.

This is about how mine was as well.

No math at all and everything was open book. Very general. Just think of it for what it is; a general type class to help you decide your major. If you want something that gets into any sort of depth, you'll probably want to take a higher level one. And from what I learned in my class, I'm sure you'd be okay skipping this and taking the next level class.

I can relate it to a chem class I took. First one was a 101 type class. No real math, very very general. Then a few years later I took a 1000 level class. Way more math, way more detailed. Made the chem 101 class seem like a total waste of time.
 
Very few institutions, and I would wager no community colleges, have an intense calculus-based intro astronomy course. There is often a very sharp separation between the 100 level description and at the most formula utilization (plug numbers into kepler's laws!) classes, and then the upper level classes which presuppose several years of physics and mathematics.

If what people are describing sounds like what you might be interested in, then go for it. But don't expect #2.
 
i took astronomy 2 this past summer and am currently enrolled in astronomy 1. i don't attend the class because it moves at too remedial a pace, and i usually have something to do in my lab that would be more productive than watching a man try to explain the doppler effect or retrograde motion to people who do not and may never understand it. The material itself is very interesting, especially in astronomy 2. I have learned a number of new things that I didn't know before taking it. I would highly recommend this course, even if it means skipping your lectures and reading the chapters yourself for the tests.

It would be nice to have mid-level astronomy class available to people who have taken modern physics, but you can't have everything, and not everyone wants to take their science credits that late in their undergrad career

Topics we touched on in the two semesters were characterization of the planets, planetary motion (the concepts, no real math), expansion of the universe, the structures of stars, galaxies, nebulae, dust clouds, and local systems, formation of stars and their evolution and death, evidence supporting the big bang theory, interpretation of spectra and other methods used to range stars, and others
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
861
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Back
Top