B Has there been no update to Allen's Astrophysical Quantities since 1999?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jenab2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    quantities
AI Thread Summary
There has been no update to CW Allen's Astrophysical Quantities since Cox's 1999 edition, which is the most recent version available. The discussion highlights the need for a reference text that includes updated astrophysical and cosmological data, particularly regarding confirmed exoplanets, which were not documented in the 1999 edition. Participants express a desire for more current statistical data in astronomy and astrophysics. The search for a more recent edition that encompasses these advancements remains ongoing. Access to updated information on exoplanets is crucial for current research in the field.
Jenab2
Messages
85
Reaction score
22
I'm looking for a reference text for astronomy and astrophysics that provides astrophysical and cosmological data since Cox's 1999 update to CW Allen's Astrophysical Quantities. Among other reasons, I'm hoping for statistical data on confirmed exoplanets, which did not exist in 1999.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The most recent edition I've found is Cox's 1999 update to CW Allen's Astrophysical Quantities. I'd like to find, and to buy, a more recent edition that contains, among other things, information on the several thousand confirmed exoplanets.
 

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Thread 'Asteroid 2024 YR4 has a 1% risk of a multi-megaton impact in 2032 (now ruled out)'

Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
View full post »

Similar threads

What topics in a Physics degree don't appear in an Astrophysics degree?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Energy conservation in Doppler (NOT cosmological) redshifts?
Replies
13
Views
3K
What are the different sub-fields and branches of astrophysics?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Admissions Opening the door to an Astrophysics PhD after a 5 year gap
Replies
11
Views
2K
A Falsifications and constraints due to GW measurements
Replies
19
Views
5K
Yet another read-my-REU-essay-please thread
Replies
3
Views
4K
I Calculating distance, object speed, etc - RE:Falcon9
Replies
7
Views
2K
How Does Solid Hydrogen Influence Astrophysics?
Replies
2
Views
5K
I Does the New Muon g-2 Measurement Indicate Physics Beyond the Standard Model?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Programs Dual Majoring in Computer Science and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top