Having Trouble With Dipole Torque and Work

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a two-part problem involving a dipole moment and its interaction with an electric field. The first part concerns calculating the torque on a dipole oriented at a specific angle in a given electric field, while the second part involves determining the work required to rotate the dipole to an antiparallel position relative to the field.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the torque equation and work formula but expresses confusion over the results obtained. Participants are asked to show their work to identify errors.
  • Some participants question the unit conversions and interpretations of the dipole moment and electric field strength, suggesting potential miscalculations in the values used.
  • There is discussion about the angle used in the work calculation, with some participants clarifying the relationship between angles in the context of the dipole's orientation.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance they can provide. There is also a noted confusion regarding the correct interpretation of the dipole moment and electric field units.

ccelt09
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
There is a two part problem that I'm struggling with.

1) A dipole with a moment of 2.5 nC . m is oriented 33 degrees from a field with strength 3.6 MN/C.

What is the magnitude of the torque on the dipole? ____ mN . m

I know the equation T = qd x E sin (theta) where qd is the given dipole moment, but even with converting and plugging in I don't get the right answer.

2)How much work is required to rotate the dipole until it's antiparallel to the field?

again i tried plugging into -pEcos(theta) but my answer is wrong.I am not quite sure why my approach isn't working or what I am doing wrong. I would greatly appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show what you did so we can see what went wrong.
 
I used the equation torque = dipole magnitude x E. the dipole came in units 2.5 nC . m, the field as 3.6 MN/C. I took the n to represent nano ^ -9 and M as Mega ^ 6. I did the appropriate conversions to have the product of the two come in units mN.m in which the program wants the answer.

2.5x10^6 mC.m x 3.6x10^6 N/C = 9x10^12 mN.m

2.5 nC x 10^6 to get to 2.5 mC . m and 3.6MN/C x 10^6 to get N/C. I feel that was probably a misinterpretation of what the units represent.

For the second part in order to find the work necessary to make the dipole antiparallel to the field i used W=-pEcos(theta)

-2.5x10^6 mC.m x 3.6x10^6 cos(57) = -4.9x10^12 ; already angled at 33 degrees, 57+33=90 = antiparallel/perpendicular
 
ccelt09 said:
I used the equation torque = dipole magnitude x E. the dipole came in units 2.5 nC . m, the field as 3.6 MN/C. I took the n to represent nano ^ -9 and M as Mega ^ 6. I did the appropriate conversions to have the product of the two come in units mN.m in which the program wants the answer.

2.5x10^6 mC.m x 3.6x10^6 N/C = 9x10^12 mN.m

2.5 nC x 10^6 to get to 2.5 mC . m and 3.6MN/C x 10^6 to get N/C. I feel that was probably a misinterpretation of what the units represent.
You're messing up the units a bit:
2.5 nC . m = 2.5x10-6 mC.m (not 2.5x10+6).

For the second part in order to find the work necessary to make the dipole antiparallel to the field i used W=-pEcos(theta)

-2.5x10^6 mC.m x 3.6x10^6 cos(57) = -4.9x10^12 ; already angled at 33 degrees, 57+33=90 = antiparallel/perpendicular
That equation tells you the potential energy, U = -pEcos(theta). To find the work, figure out the change in PE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K