Heat capacity from dispersion relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter dark_matter_is_neat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistical mechanics
dark_matter_is_neat
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
At low temperatures, a 2-d d-wave superconductor can be described as a gas of non-interacting fermions that follow dispersion relation ##E(k) = \sqrt{a^{2}k_{x}^{2}+b^{2}k_{y}^{2}}## where a and b are positive constants. The fermion number is not conserved. Determine how the specific heat of the system depends on temperature.
Relevant Equations
##U = \int_{0}^{\infty} D(E)*E*\frac{1}{e^{\frac{E}{k_{B}T}} + 1} dE##
##C = \frac{dU}{dT}##
For me the part of the problem that is giving me issues is obtaining the density of states, since typically how you would calculate D(E) as D(E) = ##\frac{A}{2 \pi} *k*\frac{dk}{dE}## but this shouldn't work since this assumes angular symmetry in k space which this dispersion relationship doesn't have. This dispersion relation essentially makes an ellipse in k space so the density of states should be ##D(E) = \frac{A}{4 \pi^{2}} * \frac{dk_{x}dk_{y}}{dE}## which I'm not really sure how to calculate. Once I get the density of states it should be pretty trivial to get the temperature dependence of the heat capacity, since after appropriate usage of u substitution the expression for U will work out to just be a constant times some power of T.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the problem is really just asking about the temperature dependence of the heat capacity I don't really need to consider the pre-factors, So rewriting ##k_{x}## and ##k_{y}## in terms of k as if in polar coordinates, ##E = k\sqrt{a^{2}cos^{2}(\phi) + b^{2}sin^{2}(\phi)}##. So E is proportional to k and thus ##\frac{dk}{dE}## is just some constant and won't add any temperature dependence. From the k-space area element, you get k times some constant and since E is proportional to k, you get E times some constant.

So in the integrand for U you get a factor of ##E^{2}##, so when substituting the variable of integration for ##\frac{E}{k_{B}T}##, you get a factor of ##T^{2}##. After this substitution the integral will just be a constant, so U will just be some constant times ##T^{2}##.

##C = \frac{dU}{dT}##, so ##C = \frac{d}{dT}(constant*T^{2})##, so C is proportional to T.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top