Heat Capacity of Distinguishable Particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the heat capacity of a system with N distinguishable particles, each having two energy levels, where the higher energy level is four-fold degenerate. The participant initially struggles with their heat capacity expression, which appears to diverge as temperature approaches zero. They derive the partition function and average energy, ultimately expressing heat capacity in terms of temperature. After receiving guidance, they apply L'Hôpital's rule to correctly evaluate the limit as temperature approaches zero, confirming that the heat capacity indeed approaches zero. This resolution highlights the importance of careful limit evaluation in thermodynamic calculations.
BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement



A system of N distinguishable particles, each with two energy levels. The lower energy level has energy equal to zero, and the higher energy level has energy ##\epsilon##. The higher energy level is four fold degenerate. Calculate the heat capacity.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I have an expression for the heat capacity, but I think I have a problem that it does not go to zero as temperature goes to zero, and was hoping to get some help on this matter.

The partition function for such a system is given by

##Z = \Sigma_s g_s e^{-\beta E(s)} = 1 + 4e^{- \beta \epsilon}##, where ##\beta = \frac{1}{k_B T}##

The average energy of the system ##\bar{E} = - \frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial \beta} = \frac{4 \epsilon e^{- \beta \epsilon}}{1 + 4 e^{- \beta \epsilon}} = \frac{4 \epsilon}{e^{\beta \epsilon} + 4}## and the heat capacity is given by ##C_v = \frac{\partial \bar{E}}{\partial T}##, so substituting back in the expression for ##\beta##

##C_v = \frac{\partial}{\partial T} \frac{4 \epsilon}{e^{\frac{\epsilon}{k_B T}} + 4} = \frac{4 \epsilon^2 e^{\frac{\epsilon}{k_B T}}}{k_B T^2 (e^{\frac{\epsilon}{k_B T}} + 4)^2}##

It looks to me like my expression blows up at T=0.

Any help is appreciated,

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show how you are taking the limit of your expression as T goes to zero?
 
TSny said:
Can you show how you are taking the limit of your expression as T goes to zero?

Your comment has made me realize I was being stupid, and just plugging zero into my equation.

I have now used l'hopital's rule and seen that the limit is indeed zero. Thanks for the nudge :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top