Heat conduction between 2 objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the thermal transfer coefficient, which is expressed in watts per meter Kelvin, and its implications for heat transfer efficiency. The participant seeks clarification on why this unit is used instead of watts per square meter and how it relates to the heat transfer process, particularly in irregularly shaped objects like a human body. They present a calculation involving two objects with different thermal properties and lengths, questioning the correctness of their approach. Fourier's law of heat conduction is referenced to explain the relationship between heat transfer, thermal conductivity, area, and temperature difference. The conversation highlights the complexity of heat transfer in multi-object systems and the importance of considering geometry and material properties.
fahraynk
Messages
185
Reaction score
6
Can someone tell me if my logic is correct here.

I am trying to figure out how the cross sectional area to make the heat transfer from one object be the maximum amount of heat transfer with the minimal amount of area... I know the thermal transfer coefficient is watts per (meter*kelvin).
I find this to be odd. So firstly can someone explain to me why its watts per meter kelvin instead of watts per square meter? If it is longer heat transfers slower even in steady state?
Secondly, if it IS watts per meter Kelvin... Then what if one object is a weird shape? What if one object is say, a human body with a heat sink on your foot. What would the thickness of the human be (Assuming a thermal coefficient "average" for the human of 0.3)
And third, assuming all the above, is the below calculation correct?

Object 1 is at 37K (Kelvin), Length 15M, transfer coefficient of 0.3 W/(M*K)
Object 2 is at 0K, Length : L2 , thermal transfer: 400 W/(M*K)

$$\frac{400*A1*37K}{15}=\frac{0.3*A2*37K}{L2}$$
$$\frac{A2}{A1}=\frac{400*0.3*L2}{15}$$
 
Science news on Phys.org
fahraynk said:
I know the thermal transfer coefficient is watts per (meter*kelvin)

That is true but when used with Fourier's law of heat conduction:

q = k * A * ΔT / L

q: heat transfer [W]
k: thermal transfer coefficient of the conductor/insulator [W/(mK)]
A: contact area [m2]
ΔT: temperature difference from heat source to heat sink [K]
L: length of material between heat source and heat sink [m]

the units will be consistent. And hopefully make more intuitive sense.

Fourier's law applies to a 3-object system (ideal heat source, conductor/insulator, and ideal heat sink). A 2-object system is a different matter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_contact_conductance
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes fahraynk
When I think of it as dT/dx it makes a bit more sense. I guess if L is large the temperature gradient has more time to change and thus changes slower, so that will slow down heat transfer since the difference in temperature would be lower between any differential distance.

That link you gave is interesting... for the purposes of sanity I will ignore interstitial materials and pressure and just assume thermal paste between the junction!
 
Last edited:
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top