Heat conductivity depending on temperature

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the thermal conductivity of nitrogen gas (N2) as part of a mechanical engineering project involving a heat exchanger. The user is using a Visual Basic function provided by an engineer, which employs an empirical equation to determine thermal conductivity based on temperature. However, the user is uncertain about the constants in the equation and seeks clarification on their significance. An alternative suggestion is made to refer to a more comprehensive equation with physical justification available in a NIST document, which could provide a better understanding and context for the calculations. Understanding the empirical nature of the original equation is crucial for accurate application in the project.
Oli Hall
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm working on my final year project for a part time mechanical engineering design degree course. I've built and tested a heat exchanger which is used for controlling the temperature of N2 gas.

I'm currently working through the calculations so I can compare real against calculated values.

I'm struggling to calculate the thermal conductivity of N2 depending on temperature. An Engineer from work gave me a Visual basic file which had the following expression which works really well. The problem is I can't work out what the components are - and I'm not happy using it if I don't understand what it's doing


Visual basic expression.

Function lambda_N2 (Temp As Double)

' Calculation of heat conductivity (W/(m*K)) depending on temperature
' for gaseous N2 - source Malkov

lambda_N2 = 0
lambda_N2 = -0.000000054111 * Temp * Temp + 0.000102445 * Temp - 0.00016339

End Function

I assume that the values he's used are constants - but as yet I've been unable to trace them. Could someone explain what some or all of it is doing?

Or is there another way of calculating thermal conductivity?
(Note. I want it for an individual temperature not for ∆T)

Many thanks in advance
Oli
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi Oli, welcome to PF.

The equation looks like an empirical fit to experimentally measured results (and as such, has little meaning without a temperature and pressure range). The constants are likely selected just to make the resulting curve fit well to measured values.

A much more involved equation with physical justification is given http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div838/theory/refprop/NAO.PDF" , which may be what you're looking for. The document also includes many references to experimental work, which may be useful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top