Heat loss rate directionality/sign convention

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the heat-loss rate through a concrete slab floor of a house, with interior and ground temperatures of 20°C and 10°C, respectively. The calculated heat-loss rate is 4.17 kW, but there is confusion regarding the sign convention, as the textbook states it should be -4.17 kW. The key point is that heat naturally flows from the hotter interior to the cooler ground, suggesting the negative sign indicates the direction of heat flow. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the physical context over strict adherence to sign conventions in equations. Ultimately, clarity on the coordinate system and the direction of heat flow is essential for accurate interpretation.
adammw111
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An 8.0m by 12m house is built on a concrete slab 23cm thick. What is the heat-loss rate through the floor if the interior is at 20°C while the ground is at 10°C?

Homework Equations



H=-k A \frac{\Delta T}{\Delta x}

kconcrete = 1.0 W / m K (approx)

The Attempt at a Solution



H=\frac{-1.0 (8 * 12) (10-20)}{0.23} = 4.17 kW

My problem is that the book (Essential University Physics, Wolfson) has the answer as -4.17 kW, but that would imply that heat is being transferred from the ground to the house, which it clearly cannot be from the temperature of the house being larger than the ground's temperature.

I usually have problems with the sign of this value of H, how do I know what direction they are asking for by "through" an object - it could be either. Would either value be acceptable in an exam?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure the sign on delta X is positive? What is your coordinate system for the horizontal slab? Is x=0 the 10 or 20 C surface?
 
First of all you have given K to be 1.0W/mK. which means 1000W/K to be used in the equation . This gives the answer to the equation to be 4.17kW.
As to which direction, heat flows from hot to cold.
Sometimes worrying about the signs that crop up in equations can be confusing... they are never 'wrong' but don't forget common sense.
 
Sorry! My mistake, mK is correct I misread it as milliKelvin and not as m.K
Ignore my previous response
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top