Heat transfer from gas to liquid during compression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the rate of heat transfer from gas to water in a closed container during compression using a liquid piston. It highlights that the convective heat transfer coefficient for gas-liquid and gas-solid interfaces is similar, but a simple liquid piston may lack sufficient surface area to dissipate heat effectively unless compression is slow. To enhance heat transfer, internal heat exchangers can be utilized to increase surface area and manage thermal mass. However, as the liquid level rises during compression, the required work input increases, complicating heat rejection. Additional considerations include the assumption of dry air and the pursuit of isothermal compression methods.
kbka
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Im working on a model where I need to look into the rate of heat transfer from a gas that's being compressed by a "liquid piston" of water.

So basically a closed container containing a fixed amount of air n of volume V, is filled with water from the bottom until the volume of the air is 1/2*V. Still same amount n.
How do I determine the rate of heat transfer from the gas to the water? eg. the overall heat transfer coefficient h for a gas-liquid interface...

Any answers or litterature suggestions would be deeply appreciated.

regards,
kbka
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
There shouldn't be any difference between a gas/liquid interface and a gas/solid interface. The convective heat transfer coefficient is the same.

What you'll find is that a simple liquid piston arrangement doesn't have sufficient surface area to reject the heat created during compression unless the compression rate is extremely slow. To get around this issue, heat exchangers are put inside the cylinder. These HX can be passive. The idea is to put a large amount of surface area into the cylinder and use the thermal mass of that material to absorb the heat. As the water or other liquid passes over this material, it cools the material down. That heat can then be rejected to atmosphere by circulating the water through another HX as the cylinder is being emptied.

The only problem with the above arrangement is that the rate of work input exponentially increases as liquid level increases, meaning that the rate of heat input to the gas increases more and more rapidly as the gas is squezed down into a smaller and smaller volume (assuming a constant liquid flow into the cylinder). As this volume decreases, so does the surface area of your internal HX. So just when you need the most surface area to reject the heat, your surface area is being covered up by the liquid. The obvious solution is to try and have as much surface area in the uppermost location of the cylinder as possible, or slow down the rate of compression at the very end of the stroke.

There are other issues with liquid piston compressors. You might want to look at a few patents to go over various issues.
462776
586100
4242878
7488159
 
Thank you very much! Also, I appreciate the insights on the internal heat exchangers.
 
kbka,

Are you assuming dry air in the cylinder (i.e. neglecting evaporation)?

Are you attempting to find a method to get closer to isothermal compression?
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'What type of toilet do I have?'
I was enrolled in an online plumbing course at Stratford University. My plumbing textbook lists four types of residential toilets: 1# upflush toilets 2# pressure assisted toilets 3# gravity-fed, rim jet toilets and 4# gravity-fed, siphon-jet toilets. I know my toilet is not an upflush toilet because my toilet is not below the sewage line, and my toilet does not have a grinder and a pump next to it to propel waste upwards. I am about 99% sure that my toilet is not a pressure assisted...
After over 25 years of engineering, designing and analyzing bolted joints, I just learned this little fact. According to ASME B1.2, Gages and Gaging for Unified Inch Screw Threads: "The no-go gage should not pass over more than three complete turns when inserted into the internal thread of the product. " 3 turns seems like way to much. I have some really critical nuts that are of standard geometry (5/8"-11 UNC 3B) and have about 4.5 threads when you account for the chamfers on either...
Back
Top