B Height measurement on other planets

AI Thread Summary
Height measurement on Mars is determined using an arbitrary zero-elevation datum, as there is no sea level for comparison. Olympus Mons, the tallest volcano in the solar system, is measured against this defined level. Initially, the zero elevation was based on a specific atmospheric pressure of 610.5 Pa, which indicated conditions under which liquid water could not exist. In 2001, the standard was updated to an equipotential surface that reflects gravitational and rotational averages. This approach allows for consistent elevation measurements across the Martian landscape.
Gustav S
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you measure the height of a mountain, you compare it's height with the sea level. But on let's say mars, how do you measure height when there is no sea to compare with?

For example: Olympus Mons is considered to be the tallest mountain or vulcano in the solar system, but what is the level on which you compare it with? There is no sea level or anything like that.

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The choice of the zero mark for elevation is rather arbitrary. For Mars, it is currently determined by an equipotential surface.

From wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Mars#Zero_elevation

Zero elevation

On Earth, the zero elevation datum is based on sea level. Since Mars has no oceans and hence no 'sea level', it is convenient to define an arbitrary zero-elevation level or "datum" for mapping the surface. The datum for Mars is arbitrarily defined in terms of a constant atmospheric pressure.

From the Mariner 9 mission up until 2001, this was chosen as 610.5 Pa (6.105 mbar), on the basis that below this pressure liquid water can never be stable (i.e., the triple point of water is at this pressure). This value is only 0.6% of the pressure at sea level on Earth. Note that the choice of this value does not mean that liquid water does exist below this elevation, just that it could were the temperature to exceed 273.16 K (0 degrees C, 32 degrees F).[4]

In 2001, Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter data led to a new convention of zero elevation defined as the equipotential surface (gravitational plus rotational) whose average value at the equator is equal to the mean radius of the planet.[5]
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top