How to Determine the Height of a Rocket After Fuel Burn?

cpburris
Gold Member
Messages
37
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Consider a rocket making a vertical ascent in a uniform gravitational field, g. Show that the height of the rocket when the fuel is exhausted is given by

x = ut_b - \frac{1}{2}g{t_b}^2-\frac{um_R}{α}ln{\frac{m_R+m_F}{m_R}}

where "u" is the exhaust velocity of the fuel, tb is the time at burnout, "α" is the fuel burn rate, mR is the mass of the rocket, and mF is the mass of the fuel.

The Attempt at a Solution



The differential equation of motion is, taking up as the positive direction:

m\frac{dv}{dt} = u\frac{dm}{dt} - mg

Solving and plugging in tb I get to:

x = \frac{um_R}{α}ln{\frac{m_R+m_F}{m_R}} -\frac{1}{2}g{t_b}^2 - ut_bln(m_R+m_F) + \frac{um_F}{α}ln(m_R+m_F) - \frac{um_F}{α}

Looks like I am getting close. Signs are off in a couple places from where I want, but I am willing to attribute that to a mistake I made somewhere. The unwanted extra terms and the coefficient in front of utb however, I can't see as being from a mistake in my calculation. That being said, I figure there must be some method to manipulate the solution to make them disappear. By request I can post my entire procedure to arrive at the point I am.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The terms ln(mR+mF) make no sense. It is not possible to take the logarithm of a physical quantity unless it is unitless. masses are not unitless. What do you propose the meaning of ln(kilogram) ought to be?

In other words, your solution fails the test of unit consistency unless the offending terms turn out to cancel out. Review your calculations keeping track of unit consistency to find the source of the problem.
 
Alright I got it. If I grouped the last three terms and factored out ut_b the terms just become equal to one. Going over my calculations I found where I messed up the signs and everything worked out.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top