Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Meaning

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) and its implications for understanding the position and momentum of electrons within quantum mechanics. Participants explore the conceptual and philosophical aspects of the principle, including its interpretation and the nature of measurement in quantum systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Philosophical implications

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the HUP indicates that while we cannot measure the exact position of an electron, such a position exists but is unknown.
  • Others argue that the electron only has a definite position when measured, and prior to measurement, it is not meaningful to ask about its location.
  • A participant suggests that the HUP is about the relationship between position and momentum, indicating that measuring one precisely limits the precision of the other.
  • Some contributions highlight that the uncertainty in position reflects a fundamental indeterminacy in quantum mechanics, contrasting with classical physics where particles have definite trajectories.
  • There are discussions about the implications of using different measurement techniques, such as the effect of photon energy on electron position during measurement.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the concept of a wavefunction and its relation to the HUP, indicating a lack of understanding of foundational concepts in quantum mechanics.
  • One participant notes that classical principles of predictability do not apply in quantum mechanics, where only probabilities can be determined.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the interpretation of the HUP and its implications for the existence of an electron's position. The discussion remains unresolved, with differing opinions on whether an exact location exists independent of measurement.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect limitations in understanding foundational concepts in quantum mechanics, such as wavefunctions and the nature of measurement. There is also a distinction made between classical and quantum perspectives on predictability and determinism.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring foundational concepts in quantum mechanics, particularly those curious about the philosophical implications of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and its interpretations.

asalmon14
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am new, and I don't have a physics background, so please excuse the question if it is incredibly easy...

Does the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle mean that we just can't measure the location of an electron to perfect accuracy, but such a location does exit (we just can't know what it is)? Or does it mean that we can know the general location of the electron, but beyond that, the electron can not be said to exist in any particular location?

So basically, does an exact location of an electron exist, even if we can't know what it is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle (in the case of momentum and position) says that we can measure the position and momentum exactly, but we can't predict beforehand what that position will be.
Basically, the HUP for momentum and position says that the spread of the probability of what the position and momentum will be must be greater than hbar/2. So if you know momentum exactly, then the electron is equally likely to be anywhere.
 
I should probably explain it more simply, the electron only has a definite position when we measure that position. Before we make the position measurement, it is useless to ask "where is the electron".
 
And adding: there is no intrinsic limitation on measuring a single particle attribute. That is NOT what the Uncertainty Principle is about. It is about the limitation on (non-commuting) pairs of attributes. Measuring one more precisely makes the other less precise. Or you might say that knowing one reduces the constraints on the other.
 
Does the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle mean that we just can't measure the location of an electron to perfect accuracy, but such a location does exit (we just can't know what it is)?
The true meaning of HUP is that position and momentum are not two separate entities, but two views of the same thing, and that thing is a wavefunction.
 
A wonderful description. Especially when considering "particles" without rest mass (photon).
(Reply #5)
 
That bit about measuring the position and momentum is not "THE" Uncertainty Principle, but rather an example of it. In the case of measuring a electron it is problematic because if we use a low energy photon (so as not to disturb the electron when we measure it)then the electron's position changes over a long time of the photons period.

If we use a photon with a shorter period, then it has more energy and will cause the electron to react and be in a different place from where it would be if we had not disturb it.

So in a way the Uncertainty Principle tells us that at the small quantum level, we can not measure (some like to say observe, but that term is often used to mislead people) particles without effecting it.

Also, the Uncertainty Principle also affects the Macroscopic world as well. It's just that it's affect is so small in the macroscopic world that the effect is considered negligible.
 
haael said:
The true meaning of HUP is that position and momentum are not two separate entities, but two views of the same thing, and that thing is a wavefunction.

So if an electron is a wavefunction, then saying that it can't be predicted to be found in an exact position is stating the obvious? I don't really understand what a wave function is. I've read the article on wikipedia, but there are too many things I don't know, like what a function is...among other things.
 
asalmon14 said:
I am new, and I don't have a physics background, so please excuse the question if it is incredibly easy...

Does the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle mean that we just can't measure the location of an electron to perfect accuracy, but such a location does exit (we just can't know what it is)? Or does it mean that we can know the general location of the electron, but beyond that, the electron can not be said to exist in any particular location?

So basically, does an exact location of an electron exist, even if we can't know what it is?

We can measure the position of an electron to any accuracy allowed by the measuring apparatus. If we had perfect instruments we would have perfect accuracy, but experimental accuracy has nothing to do with quantum uncertainty. In quantum mechanics, uncertainty in position means that the position is indeterminant; we get different values for the position when we repeat the same measurement. That is the quantum way! Generally, it is impossible for us to predict the result of a position measurement. For example, there is no answer to the question, "What is the position of an electron on a detection screen after passing through a double slit?" There are an infinite number of possibilities! Quantum mechanics will tell us all the possible results and the probability of getting each possible result.

Does the quantum electron have an exact location, but we just don't know what it is? No! There are classical experiments where electrons do behave like classical particles. Classical particles do have a position at every instant; they have trajectories. But, quantum particles, including electrons in quantum experiments, do not have trajectories. The quantum particle, as others have said, has a position only at the instant it is measured.
 
  • #10
In classical physics, there is a principle that if you know everything about a system, you can predict what will happen in the next second or the next hour, and you can rewind to predict what has happened.

ie, if you're given the speed, direction, and mass of a ball, and information about a wall, then you can predict how the ball will bounce off of the wall. You can also predict where the ball was a second ago. People had thought that if you could somehow know the speed and position of every particle in the universe, and you know all the laws, then with a big enough computer you can calculate all of the events in the universe.

But it was discovered that in quantum mechanics, you can only predict the probability of something happening. You could know the speed and direction of every particle in a system, but there is no way to know 100% where they will all be the next second, or where they were a second ago.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibrahim Hany
  • #11
that's a good example of one of the many philosophical implications of QM.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
974
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K