Helicity is different form Spin for massless particle(photon)?

time601
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
As we know photon's helicity are \pm1. Helicity is the projection of the spin S onto the direction of momentum, p, which is considered as Sz.
What about Sx and Sy? They are both ZERO?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it reasonable to say that massless particles have no spin but just helicity?
 
What we mean by the spin of a particle is the subgroup of the Lorentz group that commutes with its 4-momentum (the "little group"). For a particle with mass, go to its rest frame where the 4-momentum is Pμ = (0,0,0,1) and the spin operators are the rotations in 3-space, Sx, Sy and Sz. They form SO(3).

For a massless particle there is no rest frame, so take the 4-momentum in the z-direction, kμ = (0,0,1,1), and its spin operators are the three operators that preserve kμ.

The first one is a rotation in the (x,y) plane. This is the helicity. It acts on the components of the particle's 4-potential as Ax ± iAy → ±(Ax ± iAy).

The other two are null rotations, x → x + εk and y → y + εk. These operations just add a multiple of k to the 4-potential. But this is just a gauge transformation. So helicity is the only observable part.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top