Helmholtz coil with a ferrous core

AI Thread Summary
Using a ferrous core in a Helmholtz coil can enhance the magnetic field strength but may affect the uniformity of the field. The introduction of iron concentrates the magnetic flux, which increases the field in the desired area. However, achieving homogeneity is highly dependent on the design of the pole pieces and the saturation level of the iron. For optimal results, a deeper understanding of electromagnetism and material properties is recommended. Experimentation is possible, but it may compromise field quality and efficiency.
miloko
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Dear all,
I know that I can create a uniform field using the design of a Helmholtz coil with an air-core. However, if I use a ferrous core like iron, will I still be able to create a uniform field under the same conditions? Also, how is the equation for the magnetic field, B, changed when I add a ferrous core to the center of a Helmholtz coil?

Thanks in advance,
Mike
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you trying to generate a uniform field inside the object?
 
No. I am trying to create a uniform field between a pair of electromagnets just like the field inbetween any pair of helmholtz coils. Thanks.
 
This type of magnet used to be universally used for NMR, and can still be purchased, e.g.
http://www.walkerldjscientific.com/Products/Product_Lines/Electromagnetics/electromagnetics.html"

The iron yoke concentrates all of the return flux lines, dramatically increasing the field strength in the useful region, and the two poles concentrate the flux even further. To design a high quality magnet takes more knowledge of electromagnetism and materials than can be provided in a post. Homogeneity depends critically on the size and shape of the pole pieces, and how close to saturation magnetization the iron is, for instance. Suggest you get a copy of a text like Reitz and Milford, Foundations of Electromagnetism, and do some background study. Then take a look online at sites like
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/2404/Elect67.htm"

Of course if you aren't too concerned about homogeneity, field strength, electrical efficiency, etc., you can just fool around and see what results.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top