Help 1064 nm emitted from different sources of devices

  • Thread starter Thread starter live-in-upwey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sources
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the efficacy and side effects of 1064 nm light emitted from Long-Pulsed Diode lasers versus Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG lasers for hair removal, assuming identical fluences, pulse durations, and spot sizes. It questions whether the properties of the emitted light would be the same across different sources, suggesting that differences in light intensity over time could affect outcomes. The importance of FDA approval and clinical studies comparing the two laser types is highlighted as crucial for understanding their effectiveness. The conversation emphasizes the need for empirical data to support claims about their performance. Overall, the interaction of laser light with matter may not be significantly different if all other conditions are equal.
live-in-upwey
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Are there any differences between 1064 nm emitted by Long-Pulsed Diode laser device and 1064 nm emitted by Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG laser device for hair removal?

Assume that fluences, pulse durations & spot sizes of both devices are exactly the same, should the property, efficacy and side effects of the 1064-nm light be the same no matter what sources it comes from? Shouldn't it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Neglecting their coherence property, given the condition you assume then the two lasers should have the same energy per pulse. I expect they won't exhibit appreciable difference in the way they interact with matter.
 
live-in-upwey said:
Are there any differences between 1064 nm emitted by Long-Pulsed Diode laser device and 1064 nm emitted by Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG laser device for hair removal?

Assume that fluences, pulse durations & spot sizes of both devices are exactly the same, should the property, efficacy and side effects of the 1064-nm light be the same no matter what sources it comes from? Shouldn't it?
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

Laser fluence is related to the overall amount of energy delivered by the pulse. I don't think you can assume that the light intensity versus time is the same just because the fluences are the same. Do you have any data showing the laser light flux versus time for each of those pulse sources?

https://www.rp-photonics.com/fluence.html

Has the FDA approved devices that use each of those light sources? Are there any clinical studies comparing their effectiveness to each other?
 
I'll try to get the info from the manufacturers. Thank you for your info, very much appreciated.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top