Help About charge conjugation of Dirac spinor

snooper007
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
The following formula appears in P J Mulders's lecture notes
http://www.nat.vu.nl/~mulders/QFT-0E.pdf

{\cal C}~b(k,\lambda)~{\cal C}^{-1}~=~d(k,{\bar \lambda}) (8.18)

where {\cal C} is charge conjugation operator.
\lambda is helicity.
I don't know why there is {\bar {\lambda}} on the right side,
as is well known that charge conjugation can not change helicity, spin, and momentum.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The phases used to define negative energy or anti-particle spinors are often author dependent -- for example, the C matrix is diagonal in Weinberg's book, and off diagonal in Gross's text. Gross uses a different convention for defining antiparticle spinors than do Bjorken and Drell As far as I can figure, you'll have to track through the charge-c process starting with Mulder's conventions for particle and antiparticle spinors. Note that often the CCD relates the complex conjugate antiparticle spinor to the particle spinor. Good luck.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top