Help Algebra 2/Trigonometry Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter daodude1987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The equation x = -b/2a is derived from the quadratic formula x = (-b ± √(b²-4ac)) / 2a, specifically for cases where the discriminant (b²-4ac) equals zero, indicating one real root. This equation helps find the x-coordinate of the vertex of a quadratic function, represented as (h, k) where h = -b/2a. The absence of the square root term in x = -b/2a signifies that there is only one real solution for x. Substituting x = -b/2a back into the original quadratic equation confirms its validity. Thus, x = -b/2a effectively identifies the x-coordinate when the quadratic has a single real root.
daodude1987
I'm having trouble with proving this equation: x=-b\2a
I am not really familiar with this equation but my trigonometry teacher says it is something from Algebra 2. How can I prove why or how this equation works for finding the x-coordinate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking into account that its almost midnight, i think i can scrap together an answer.

you are talking about using a specific equation:

ax^2 + bx + c ( quadratic)

however you use this equation:

f(x) = a(x-h)^2 + k (to put it into an equation that will make it easier to find the vertex of the equation)

h = -b/2a
k = c - ah^2 ( I am almost positive this is right)

the vertex will equal (h,k) so if the vertex liex on the x-axis u will have an x coordinate of the graph. hope that helps some
 


To prove this equation, we need to use the quadratic formula: x = (-b ± √(b²-4ac)) / 2a. This formula is used to find the roots of a quadratic equation in the form of ax² + bx + c = 0.

Now, let's compare this formula with the given equation x = -b/2a. We can see that the only difference is the absence of the square root term in the given equation.

To understand why this equation works for finding the x-coordinate, we need to look at the discriminant (b²-4ac) in the quadratic formula. The discriminant determines the nature of the roots of a quadratic equation. If the discriminant is positive, the equation has two distinct real roots, if it is zero, the equation has one real root, and if it is negative, the equation has two complex roots.

In the given equation x = -b/2a, we can see that the discriminant is not present. This means that the equation has only one real root, which is the x-coordinate. This is because the quadratic formula gives us the two possible values for x, but in this case, the ±√(b²-4ac) term becomes zero, leaving us with only one value for x, which is the x-coordinate.

To further prove this, we can substitute the value of x = -b/2a in the original quadratic equation ax² + bx + c = 0. We will get (-b/2a)(a(-b/2a)² + b(-b/2a) + c) = 0, which simplifies to (-b/2a)(b²/4a²) = 0. This gives us the same result as x = (-b ± √(b²-4ac)) / 2a, but in this case, the ±√(b²-4ac) term becomes zero, leaving us with only one value for x, which is the x-coordinate.

Therefore, we can conclude that the given equation x = -b/2a works for finding the x-coordinate because it is a simplified version of the quadratic formula, specifically for equations with only one real root.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top