Help coming up with a formula for determining weight lost in cold.

AI Thread Summary
Staying in cold environments causes the body to burn calories to maintain warmth, leading to potential weight loss. However, this process is complex and involves factors such as individual body composition, metabolic rate, and the specific heat of body tissues. To accurately calculate weight loss in cold conditions, one would need to consider the mean thermal conductivity of body tissue and the convective heat transfer coefficient of skin, rather than just specific heat. Additionally, the body's ability to generate heat through metabolism, shivering, and other physiological responses plays a crucial role in maintaining temperature. The ambient temperature and humidity also significantly influence heat loss, with water posing a greater risk for hypothermia than air at the same temperature. Overall, while cold exposure can lead to calorie burning, it is not a sustainable or healthy weight loss method without proper nutritional intake.
wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
When you're cold, your body naturally burns calories to keep you warm. So it makes sense to me that if people were to just stay out in the cold enough, that they could lose some weight. Also, it seems that you could probabally figure out a formula to determine exactly how much weight you'll lose depending on how much you weigh, how long you stay out in the cold, and how cold it is. Though I suppose the specific heats of your bodily substances besides water would be of great importance in figuring it out exactly...

So first off, I'd have to know the average specific heat of the organic compounds in your body, then find the average specific heat of your body as a whole. After I've got the average specific heat of the human body, I'd need to know exactly how much heat cold air would "steal" form the body per a specific temperature.

Could anyone help me out a bit here? I'm somewhat brain-boggled right now, and can't really think of how this would work out...
 
Biology news on Phys.org
yea, i guess it does make sense but i think it's the same as starving youself. in the cold, you burn more calories to function your body AND to keep warm so you would quickly feel hungry, so you eat to get more calories and the same goes on. keep on burning and eating. if you don't eat, you'd lose weight (in an unhealthy manner) by starving yourself in the cold.
 
wasteofo2 said:
When you're cold, your body naturally burns calories to keep you warm. So it makes sense to me that if people were to just stay out in the cold enough, that they could lose some weight.
Yes, I've maintained that the best way to lose weight is to open the refrigerator...and stay put. :biggrin:
Also, it seems that you could probabally figure out a formula to determine exactly how much weight you'll lose depending on how much you weigh, how long you stay out in the cold, and how cold it is. Though I suppose the specific heats of your bodily substances besides water would be of great importance in figuring it out exactly...
So first off, I'd have to know the average specific heat of the organic compounds in your body, then find the average specific heat of your body as a whole. After I've got the average specific heat of the human body, I'd need to know exactly how much heat cold air would "steal" form the body per a specific temperature.
Could anyone help me out a bit here? I'm somewhat brain-boggled right now, and can't really think of how this would work out...
The specific heat is not what you want. THere are two quantities more important that it, which determine the rate of heat loss. They are : (i) the mean thermal conductivity of body tissue, and (ii) the convective heat transfer coefficient of skin (with/without hair). Get these numbers, and I'll help you with the calculation - this is a physics probem, even if it is set in a biological context.
 
Last edited:
It might be good to acknowledge that the body can only break down fat at a set rate. If this was not so then people would not freeze to death until they starved. Hope this has some meaning.
-Scott
 
You would also have to factor in the individual's metabolic rate, how much fat reserves they have (not just as an energy supply, but also as insulation), whether they are eating any other food that provides energy, etc. What you really need to figure out isn't just how quickly a body loses heat, which would only apply to a corpse (such a measure can be used to help approximate time of death), but at what ambient temperature the body cannot provide enough heat energy through metabolism, shivering, vasoconstriction in extremities to keep blood restricted to the body core, etc., to maintain body temperature. In other words, when does the rate of heat loss exceed the ability of the body to generate heat. The temperature at which this occurs would also depend on things like humidity, which would affect conductivity of the heat away from the body. For example, you can maintain body temperature fairly well in 68 degree (F) air, but jump into a 68 F body of water, and hypothermia becomes a concern.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top