HELP Detrivative matrix/system of equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter theacerf1
  • Start date Start date
theacerf1
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Iv been stuck on this question for hrs now, no idea how to solve it. Can someone please explain, thanks! :)

Let p(x) be a cubic polynomial and p′(x) be its derivative, and suppose that p(1) = 8,
p(−1) = −3, p′(2) = 0 and p′(−2) = 0. Find p(x).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to the forum! First of all, if this is a homework question, you should post it in the homework section of the forum.

If this isn't a homework question, I'll be happy to post my solution, but I'll wait for your response. You could start by writing p(x) = ax3 + bx2 + cx + d and trying to solve for the unknowns using your restraints.
 
Hey spamiam, no its not a homework question, iv got my exam nxt week for math and just working through different textbooks solving different problems. The textbook only gives the answer but what I want to know is how they got the answer, basically the working out as i have no idea how to solve this kind of question if it pops up in the exam :(

Yeah, wat u wrote is all i could basically think of too...
p(x) = ax3 + bx2 + cx + d
p'(x) = 3ax^2 + 2bx + c

then subbing p(1) = 8, p(−1) = −3, p′(2) = 0 and p′(−2) = 0 to get 4 equations. Then I am totally stuck. There is more questions just like this so if i can work out exactly how to do this, i can attempt the other ones with different numbers.

Thanks for the help and quick reply :)
 
Well that's a good start: 4 equations with 4 unknowns. Here's what I got

(1) a + b + c + d = p(1) = 8

(2) -a + b - c + d = p(-1) = -3

(3) 12a + 4b + c = p'(2) = 0

(4) 12a - 4b + c = p'(-2) = 0

You can just use Gaussian elimination, but I think it might be easier to just solve this particular system using a couple tricks. Subtracting (4) from (3), I get 8b = 0, so b=0, simplifying things significantly. Adding (1) and (2) together, I get 2b + 2d = 5, so b + d = 5/2. Since b=0, then d = 5/2. Using (3) with b=0, we have c = -12a. Subtracting (2) from (1), we have 2a + 2c = 11, so a + c = 11/2. Substituting in c = -12a, we get a = -1/2, so c = 6. so p(x) = -\frac{1}{2}x^3 +6x + \frac{5}{2}.

Anyway, there are no real fixed rules for solving systems of equations, aside from Gaussian elimination, so you just have to play around with them to eliminate variables.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top