Help Finding path of a particle with an intial position and initial velocity

ezedvin1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am having trouble finding the answer to a homework problem. I don't seem to understand what the question is exactly asking for. The problem is:

find the path of a particle with an initial position 10er + 1.0eϴ and an initial velocity 0.1er + 0.8eϴ
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered using the kinematics for cylindrical coordinates?
 
the equations I am thinking about using are

Cylindrical coordinates: r, ∅, z
x=rcos∅ y=rsin∅

Spherical Coordinates: r, θ, ∅
x=rsinθcos∅ y=rsinθsin∅ z=rcosθ

I also know an equation for velocity as v=\dot{r}er + r\dot{θ}eθ

I'm still very confused as to what to do with all these equations to find the path of the particle. Please Help.
 
Last edited:
Those equations look like they are for converting from Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical / spherical coordinates.

Try looking around in your book for the kinematic equations in cylindrical / spherical form. If they aren't in your book you could try going to this link

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion

and try looking for them by Crtl+F and typing in what you're looking for.

I haven't ever worked with those coordinate systems and kinematic equations before, otherwise I would be more helpful.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top