Help finding the eigenvalues of this

  • Thread starter Thread starter subopolois
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvalues of a 3x3 matrix A, specifically addressing the challenges faced by the original poster in calculating the determinant and subsequently the eigenvalues. The matrix in question is presented, and the original poster expresses difficulty in extending their understanding from 2x2 matrices to this 3x3 case.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of calculating the determinant, with suggestions to use cofactor expansion along a row with zeros for simplification. There are inquiries about the validity of different methods for determinant evaluation and the implications of choosing one over the other.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the process of determinant calculation and exploring different methods. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of cofactor expansion and the advantages of factoring out eigenvalues. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches without a clear consensus on a single method.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's previous learning experiences and the constraints of homework rules that may affect their approach to solving the problem. Additionally, the discussion touches on the potential for creating zeros in the matrix to simplify calculations.

subopolois
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


alright, so i have a question which asks me to find the eigenvalues of a 3x3 square matrix A. after working on it for a long time, i can't figure it out, i know the process of it and i can do 2x2 matrices easily, i cannot figure this one out though. here is the matrix A;
2 0 0
1 2 -1
1 3 -2


Homework Equations


(Ix-A)


The Attempt at a Solution


ive gotten this so far, using the above equation
x-2 0 0
-1 x-2 1
-1 -3 x+2
i know i have to take the determinant of the above, and I am pretty sure I am doing something wrong with getting the determinant, but i can't figure it out.
((x^3-2x^2-4x+8)+0+0)) - (0+(-3x+6)+0))
= (x^3-2x^2-4x+8)-(-3x+6)
= x^3-2x^2-7x+2

from this i know i have to find the roots, which will give me my eigenvalues. can someone help me, mabey point out my mistakes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what method you are using to calculate the determinant; but whatever you're doing, you're doing it incorrectly.

Since there are two zeros in the top row of your matrix, the easiest way to take the determinant is to expand it along the top row:

[tex]\begin{vmatrix}x-2 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & x-2 & 1 \\ -1 & -3 & x+2 \end{vmatrix}=(x-2)\begin{vmatrix} x-2 & 1 \\ -3 & x+2 \end{vmatrix}+(0)\begin{vmatrix} -1 & 1 \\ -1 & x+2 \end{vmatrix}+(0)\begin{vmatrix}-1 & x-2 \\ -1 & -3 \end{vmatrix}[/tex]
 
subopolois said:

The Attempt at a Solution


ive gotten this so far, using the above equation
x-2 0 0
-1 x-2 1
-1 -3 x+2
i know i have to take the determinant of the above, and I am pretty sure I am doing something wrong with getting the determinant, but i can't figure it out.
((x^3-2x^2-4x+8)+0+0)) - (0+(-3x+6)+0))
= (x^3-2x^2-4x+8)-(-3x+6)
= x^3-2x^2-7x+2
You can evaluate the det by co-factor expansion along the first row. Doing so has the advantage of factoring out one eigenvalue so you only have to factorise the expression inside the co-factor determinant. So if you do so, you should have [tex](x-2)[(x-2)(x+2) + 3][/tex]. From there you can easily find the eigenvalues.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
I'm not sure what method you are using to calculate the determinant; but whatever you're doing, you're doing it incorrectly.

Since there are two zeros in the top row of your matrix, the easiest way to take the determinant is to expand it along the top row:

[tex]\begin{vmatrix}x-2 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & x-2 & 1 \\ -1 & -3 & x+2 \end{vmatrix}=(x-2)\begin{vmatrix} x-2 & 1 \\ -3 & x+2 \end{vmatrix}+(0)\begin{vmatrix} -1 & 1 \\ -1 & x+2 \end{vmatrix}+(0)\begin{vmatrix}-1 & x-2 \\ -1 & -3 \end{vmatrix}[/tex]

would this be called the cofactor expansion?
 
Yes, it's det evaluation by co-factor expansion along row/column.
 
Defennder said:
Yes, it's det evaluation by co-factor expansion along row/column.

should i always choose the row/column with the most zeros? what if the matrix doesn't have any?
 
Well there would always be a row/column with the most 0's, just that it may not have a row/col with only 1 non-zero entry. If it doesn't have any, add multiples of one row/col to another to create the 0's yourself. Doing so does not change the determinant.
 
Defennder said:
Well there would always be a row/column with the most 0's, just that it may not have a row/col with only 1 non-zero entry. If it doesn't have any, add multiples of one row/col to another to create the 0's yourself. Doing so does not change the determinant.

alright i have another example where i have to make zeros
x-1 -1 3
-2 x -6
-1 1 x-5
i choose to add row 1 and row 3 to make a zero at row 1, column 2
x-2 0 x-2
-2 x -6
-1 1 x-5
so now i expand the first row, is this correct?

im my class I've learned to find the determinant another way, say i have a matrix
a b c
d e f
g h i
i could find the determinant this way
det= (aei+bfg+cdh)-(gec+hfa+ibd)

why couldn't i just solve the determinat this way instead of the cofactor expansion? how do i know which method to use?
 
Last edited:
subopolois said:
alright i have another example where i have to make zeros
x-1 -1 3
-2 x -6
-1 1 x-5
i choose to add row 1 and row 3 to make a zero at row 1, column 2
x-2 0 x-2
-2 x -6
-1 1 x-5
so now i expand the first row, is this correct?
Yes it appears so, except to make it even easier you could add a negative of the first column to the third one.

im my class I've learned to find the determinant another way, say i have a matrix
a b c
d e f
g h i
i could find the determinant this way
det= (aei+bfg+cdh)-(gec+hfa+ibd)

why couldn't i just solve the determinat this way instead of the cofactor expansion? how do i know which method to use?
They are both equally valid. Except if you do it this way you have to factor a third degree polynomial which in general isn't easy. On the other hand, evaluating determinants through the above method allows you to factor out one eigenvalue so all you're left with is a quadratic expression which is usually a lot simpler to factorise compared to a cubic one.
 
  • #10
Defennder said:
Yes it appears so, except to make it even easier you could add a negative of the first column to the third one.

They are both equally valid. Except if you do it this way you have to factor a third degree polynomial which in general isn't easy. On the other hand, evaluating determinants through the above method allows you to factor out one eigenvalue so all you're left with is a quadratic expression which is usually a lot simpler to factorise compared to a cubic one.

thank you very much, you have no idea how much you have helped me
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K