Help frequency to dB relationship

AI Thread Summary
To design a filter with a 24 dB/oct slope and a 0 dB point at 90 Hz, it's essential to determine the -6 dB point for the crossover, which varies based on the filter topology (e.g., Butterworth, Chebyshev, Elliptical). Using tools like Mathematica or Excel can help visualize the frequency response and identify how close the -6 dB point is to the desired flat response. Different filter types have unique characteristics, affecting passband and stopband behavior, as well as knee sharpness. Real-world considerations, such as component tolerances from suppliers like Digikey, can impact the filter's performance. The choice of filter topology should balance sharpness with practical manufacturing concerns.
frogdogbb
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I am having trouble figures out the following filter I am designing. I to use a filter with a 24db/oct slope I want 0dB@90hz. So if I want the knee of the cuttof curve to start at 90Hz how do I find the -6dB point so I can design the crossover, by the way this filter uses -6dB as the crossover point as opposed to the usual -3dB.
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It depends on the topology of your filter. Cheby, Butterworth, etc. Just put a generic form of the candidate polynomials into Mathematica or even Excel, and plot out the frequency response. That will start to show you how close you can get a 0dB flat spot to the -6dB point with each polynomial. It's way different for the different filter topologies. Keep in mind that in the real world, there can be some disadvantages to the sharper edged filters. Quiz question -- what is generally the main disadvangate of the sharper filters...?
 
I don't know what is the main disadvantage? Size, added complexity? It is an active filter so componet losses are not really an issue.
 
frogdogbb said:
I don't know what is the main disadvantage? Size, added complexity? It is an active filter so componet losses are not really an issue.
Nope. Hint -- you need to order the resistors and capacitors from Digikey to build your filter. Read the datasheets from digikey for the real components, and resimulate the filter response, based on the published tolerances. See any problems?
 
frogdogbb said:
Hello all, I am having trouble figures out the following filter I am designing. I to use a filter with a 24db/oct slope I want 0dB@90hz. So if I want the knee of the cuttof curve to start at 90Hz how do I find the -6dB point so I can design the crossover, by the way this filter uses -6dB as the crossover point as opposed to the usual -3dB.
Thanks
BTW, keep in mind that the different topology filters have different characteristics in the passbands and stop bands, as well as different knee sharpness characteristics. The Butterworth is flat and slow, the Cheby is better if you can tolerate some ripple in the passband (not 0dB all across), and the Elliptical is better yet in terms of a sharp knee, if you can tolerate gain ripple in both the passband and stopband.

But the quiz question that I posed above would also factor into your decision for a real world filter (another hint here), especially if you plan on building them in the millions...
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top