Help, i keep on getting probability >1

  • Thread starter Thread starter huan.conchito
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of rolling at least one "4" when rolling a fair die twice. The initial calculation incorrectly resulted in a probability greater than 1, specifically 42/36, while the correct probability is 11/36. A breakdown of all possible outcomes confirms that 11 out of 36 combinations include at least one "4." An alternative method involves calculating the probability of rolling zero "4s," which is 25/36, leading to the correct probability of at least one "4" being 1 - 25/36 = 11/36. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding mutually exclusive events in probability calculations.
huan.conchito
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Roll a fair die twice and find the probability of at least one 4
here's what i did:

P(A) = |A|/|Ω| = (6C1*6C0+6C1*6C1)/(6C1*6C1)
And i get the answer as 42/36 and the real answer is 5/36
what did I do wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
huan.conchito said:
Roll a fair die twice and find the probability of at least one 4
here's what i did:

P(A) = |A|/|Ω| = (6C1*6C0+6C1*6C1)/(6C1*6C1)
And i get the answer as 42/36 and the real answer is 5/36
what did I do wrong
Although enumeration isn't the most efficient solution to probability problems, sometimes it can show where errors are occurring. All possible 36 outcomes of 2 rolls of a fair die are shown below. Those containing At Least One (1) "Four (4)" are highlited. By counting the highlited cases below, it can be seen that exactly (11) cases out of (36) show at least one (1) "Four (4)". Therefore, the required probability is (11/36).

Roll
AB
==
11
12
13
14
15
16

21
22
23
24
25
26

31
32
33
34
35
36

41
42
43
44
45
46


51
52
53
54
55
56

61
62
63
64
65
66
==

~~
 
huan,

xanthym is right; it's hard to argue with a 100% coverage test!

Another way to get the same answer (and it works on LOTS of probability problems) relies on the fact that "getting at least one 4" and "getting exactly zero 4s" are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. In other words, all possible outcomes are included in one or the other but not both of these. So their probabilities have to sum to 1. But the probability of "getting exactly zero 4s" is easy to calculate; it's just 5/6 *5/6 = 25/36. So the prob of "getting at least one 4" is 1- 25/36 = 11/36
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top