Help me identify this mystery structure in my SEM image?

AI Thread Summary
A user has discovered recurring circular structures in a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a pyrex sample that previously contained a mixture of xenon and nitrogen gas, along with rubidium. The sample was subjected to laser irradiation and high temperatures, and the user is investigating potential etching or pitting caused by xenon excimers. The mystery structures were absent in a control sample, leading to speculation about their origin. One suggestion is that these features resemble impact craters, possibly indicating surface defects from microscopic impacts. The user is seeking further insights or identification of these structures.
CFlower
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

As the title suggests, I've found some recurring structure on an SEM image and I can't for the life of me figure out what it is. I took the image this morning.

Here she is:
http://i.imgur.com/nFuBsW2.png

Here's a larger, more zoomed out and higher res version. A few more of the mystery objects are visible.

http://i.imgur.com/gEXW4KN.jpg

I found plenty of these things. Here's some background on the sample. This was a piece of pyrex from a glass cell that contained a mixture of xenon and nitrogen gas. It also contained rubidium. The cell was continuously irradiated with 795 nm laser light, and heated sometimes up to 180 C. We washed out the rubidium by slowly reacting it with alcohol before breaking the cell open. I've been examining the cell surface looking for etching or pitting in the glass possibly caused by xenon excimers. So far, inconclusive. But I've been completely baffled by these circular structures that keep appearing. They were not present at all on a control piece of pyrex that I imaged.

Does anyone recognize this? What might it be?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not familiar with scanning electron microscopy, but the features look very similar to impact craters. Especially since they all seem to contain some central feature. Perhaps it is a surface defect due to microscopic impacts.
 
Thanks for your input. I've considered that suggestion and I think it's viable. Here are some SEM images of microcratering in a similar vein that are fairly interesting. http://ccldas.blogspot.ca/2011/05/more-sem-images.html
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top