Help me out please - Car accident analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force of impact in a car accident involving two vehicles with different weights and speeds. Participants emphasize that determining the exact force of impact is not feasible due to the complexities of collision dynamics and the variability of forces during the event. Legal considerations are highlighted, noting that any analysis provided may not hold up in court without expert testimony. The severity of damage observed suggests that the second vehicle may have been traveling faster than reported. Ultimately, the conversation suggests focusing on momentum conservation rather than direct force calculations for a more accurate understanding of the collision.
Rob86
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Help me out please -- Car accident analysis

hey guys, I have a question... If car 1 weighing in at 4400lbs is traveling at 0 degree heading at 55 MPH and is impacted on the right side by car 2 weighing in at 2700 lbs from a 90 degree heading traveling at 5 mph and the departure angle of car 1 is 45 degrees, and the time variable is 1 second. what was the force of the impact?

This is not a homework question, this is my car and I would like to know the force from the impact.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151820048022474&l=3048728d64
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151820047657474&l=952d90083f

let me know if you need any more data. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Questions of this sort.are very common on PF. But the "force of the impact" is not knowable. Force is not a consideration in such matters. To put a good legal case, you need the authority of an accepted legal expert, I'm afraid, using the appropriate terminology and academic qualifications. Any Physics you may read here can be as accurate as you like but it will cut no ice in court.
 
5mph? Given the severity of the damage to the door of the Z (which I'm assuming is car 1 in this question), it looks like the second car was going a lot more than 5mph. As sophiecentaur said though, we can't say anything conclusive or legally useful here - we can speculate, but there's not enough information to say much, and anything we can say would almost definitely not be admissible in court.
 
I'm not sure there's a meaningful answer to the question. As far as I know, forces involved in collisions tend to vary quite wildly during the collision process. The force starts off very small then grows to be huge as compression of the material happens and then drops off to zero, all in the span of a few ms. This is one of the reasons that collisions are often analyzed in terms of momentum conservation rather than a direct application of Newton's 2nd Law.

Chris.
 
I guess a good photograph of the damage could appeal to a judge's common sense if you are trying to discredit your opponent's estimation of speed. Does your car insurance cover legal representation?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top