Help me understand electromagnetism.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrspeedybob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores two hypothetical experiments related to electromagnetism. In the first experiment, two parallel wires carrying current in the same direction generate an attractive magnetic force, contrary to the initial expectation of a repulsive interaction. The second experiment involves two electron beams, where both attractive magnetic forces and repulsive Coulomb forces are present; however, the repulsive forces dominate unless the beams are relativistic. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these forces in the context of particle accelerator design, particularly for high-current charged-particle beams. Overall, the interaction of electric and magnetic fields with charged particles is complex and varies significantly based on the conditions of the experiment.
mrspeedybob
Messages
869
Reaction score
65
Here are two hypothetical experiments to illustrate my confusion...

#1
Two wires are positioned parallel to each other. A current is applied to both wires in the same direction. I would expect the 2 currents to each generate a magnetic field and that the 2 fields would interact to produce a force pulling the wires towered each other.

#2
Two electron guns fire electrons 1 by 1 simultaneously along parallel trajectories. Since each electron is going at the same speed there is no relative motion between them, they should behave the same as if they were sitting still. If they were sitting still then they should repel each other.

Do I have the correct expectation for each of these experiments? If not, what is my error. If so then the only difference I see between these 2 experiments is the presence or absence of the conductor. Why does this matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In 1., there is no electric field. It is balanced out by the metallic atoms of the wire. Only the magnetic field can be observed.
 
EM fields do not interact with each other. Their effects are only exerted on matter.
 
Your two hypothetical experiments propose very interesting and important electromagnetic problems in charged particle beams.

#1 has already been answered. There is only an attractive magnetic force.

#2 has both the attractive magnetic force between the two beams (actually between the magnetic field of one beam and the Lorentz force on individual moving charges in the other) and the repulsive Coulomb forces (between the charge per unit length in one beam and individual charges in the other). When transforming from the lab frame into the center of mass frame where the charges are motoinless, the attractive magnetic forces become attractive Coulomb (E = q(v x B)) forces.

In this second case, the repulsive Coulomb force is always larger than the attractive magnetic force. But when the beams become extremely relativistic, the two opposing forces cancel. See my post #5 and attachments in

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=405055

These two opposing forces also exist within single high-current charged-particle beams. For intense proton beams with very low beam size and low divergence (low "phase space"), preventing the Coulomb forces from blowing the beam size up before the beam becomes relativistic is an important aspect of particle accelerator design.

Bob S
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top