Help me understand how much heat sink possible with frozen H2O

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maximiliano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat Heat sink
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using frozen water as a coolant in a personal cooling system, particularly in the context of outdoor activities like mountain climbing in warm conditions. Participants explore the heat sink capacity of frozen water and its effectiveness in cooling a person exerting themselves in high temperatures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the effectiveness of using 128oz of frozen water as a coolant for a person in 90°F heat for three hours, suggesting that the ice would melt too quickly to provide significant cooling.
  • Another participant calculates that 8 lbs of ice requires approximately 1200 kJ to melt and estimates that it could provide cooling for about 1 hour and 20 minutes under certain conditions, assuming no heat loss to the environment.
  • There is a suggestion that using the melted ice for evaporative cooling by wetting a bandana could enhance the cooling effect.
  • One participant raises the idea of starting with ice at temperatures lower than 0°C, such as -40°C or -50°C, to potentially improve cooling capacity, although this could introduce risks of frostbite.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and effectiveness of using frozen water as a coolant, with no consensus reached on the optimal starting temperature or the overall viability of the cooling system.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding heat generation during physical exertion and the balance of heat loss to the environment, which remain unresolved. The calculations provided depend on specific conditions that may not hold in practice.

maximiliano
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
So many questions on this topic...but I guess the starting point would be to explain the reason for the question. That way, maybe someone can help me work backwards to answer the question...and thus I can apply that to other situations.

I have a friend who thinks he can make a personal cooling system, using frozen water (0c) as the coolant. I say that the amount of heat sink capacity of say 128oz of frozen water, is probably way too small to matter, in terms of cooling a person off while climbing a mountain, in 90 F degree heat, for 3 hours. Add to that the weight of the water itself is 8 pounds. It seems to me the ice would be melted and assume the ambient temp so quickly, that little would have happened in terms of cooling the person off...over a 3 hour period of exertion.

So, I'm trying to understand (maybe there's a solid formula for this) how much heat sink is possible, using ice as the sink, and an ambient temp. or 90F...or 99F I guess, since the purpose is to sink energy from the person, which is surely 99F.

I have another question, which is related...but I'll ask it separately.

Thanks in advance as always!
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
8 lb (3.6kg) ice takes 3.6*334 = 1200 kJ to melt it.
Walking slowly generates 150W. For mountain walking I see a figure of 300W, but I'm not sure whether that is heat generated or power consumed; the difference is that a lot of the energy goes into raising you up the mountain, so does not end up as heat. Let's take 250W.
In practice, some ice will melt as a result of heat from the environment, but suppose we could prevent that; or, at least, suppose that it roughly balances the heat lost by the walker to the environment. 1200kJ/250W = 4800 seconds = 1 hour 20 minutes.
The melted ice would still be cold, so you could get another 20 minutes from that. Better still, use it to wet a bandana, so now you get evaporative cooling too, and the weight reduces.
 
And the climber has something to drink.

Why start at 0c? Why not start at -40c or -50c? I realize most of the heat is absorbed during melting but starting colder certainly can't hurt.
 
mrspeedybob said:
Why start at 0c? Why not start at -40c or -50c? I realize most of the heat is absorbed during melting but starting colder certainly can't hurt.
No harm in replacing heat stroke by frostbite...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K