Help on KE of photoelectron emmision

  • Thread starter Thread starter carus88
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy (KE) of photoelectrons emitted from an aluminum surface when exposed to 180nm light, with a work function of 4.2 eV. The maximum KE of the fastest emitted photoelectrons is calculated to be 2.69 eV using the equation KE max = hf - W. For the slowest emitted photoelectrons, the minimum KE is determined using the threshold frequency, which corresponds to the work function energy. The cutoff wavelength is found by calculating the threshold frequency and converting it to wavelength. Overall, the participants clarify the equations needed for these calculations and confirm the approach to finding the minimum KE and cutoff wavelength.
carus88
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
'light of wavelength 180nm falls on an aluminium surface. the work funct is 4.2eV.
what is the KE of the fastest and slowest emmited photoelectrons?
Also the cutoff wavelength for the Aluminium?
i only need the right equations an a little guidance as i myt as well be a complete novice.

i have worked out what i think is the max KE as 2.69eV

using KE max = hf - W (w as the work funct)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The second part asks for kinetic energy of the slowest emitted electrons. What do you imagine is the slowest speed an electron can be emitted? The cutoff wavelength is just that wavelength that provides the same energy of the work function.
 
so i use the work funct equation an work backwards to get the threshold freq an then the cut off wavelength?

and for the min KE use the threshold freq?
 
exactly! :smile:
 
thank you so much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top