Help please -- Amplitude of a spring - does it change with mass?

AI Thread Summary
The amplitude of a spring in Simple Harmonic Motion can be influenced by the method of energy input and the specifics of the problem. In some scenarios, amplitude remains constant regardless of mass, while in others, it changes with varying mass, particularly when velocity is constant. The relationship between amplitude, mass, and velocity is contingent on how the oscillator is driven, whether by force or energy. Understanding the energy dynamics is crucial, as potential energy in the spring correlates to kinetic energy in the mass. Ultimately, the amplitude's dependence on mass is not absolute and varies based on the conditions set in the problem.
Izzy Levine
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello! In some of my college Physics practice problems, amplitude of a spring in Simple Harmonic Motion does not change with mass (for example, when the mass splits in 2 at equilibrium in a horizontal oscillator - see picture). But, in other problems, the Vmax of the oscillator remains constant with changing mass while A changes. Which is true? Is amplitude independent of mass or not? And for velocity?

Thanks! (Exam is tonight, SOS!)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-12-12 at 12.25.50 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-12-12 at 12.25.50 PM.png
    49.1 KB · Views: 580
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
Izzy Levine said:
Hello! In some of my college Physics practice problems, amplitude of a spring in Simple Harmonic Motion does not change with mass (for example, when the mass splits in 2 at equilibrium in a horizontal oscillator - see picture). But, in other problems, the Vmax of the oscillator remains constant with changing mass while A changes. Which is true? Is amplitude independent of mass or not? And for velocity?

Thanks! (Exam is tonight, SOS!)
This is going to depend on the specifics of the problem. Often, amplitude is ignored or given, because the more interesting changes are to period. For a real-world system, how amplitude is affected will depend on how the system is set in motion. Eg, is amplitude specified? Force? Energy? Speed?

In this problem, the energy is input and the equilibrium speed is the bridge between the before and after scenarios.
 
  • Like
Likes tech99 and Izzy Levine
Izzy Levine said:
Hello! In some of my college Physics practice problems, amplitude of a spring in Simple Harmonic Motion does not change with mass (for example, when the mass splits in 2 at equilibrium in a horizontal oscillator - see picture). But, in other problems, the Vmax of the oscillator remains constant with changing mass while A changes. Which is true? Is amplitude independent of mass or not? And for velocity?

Thanks! (Exam is tonight, SOS!)
The two cases you quote are equivalent to an electrical LC circuit where the generator either inserts a specified current in series with LC or applies a specified voltage across L and C in parallel.
In the first case, the defined current creates a large voltage across L and C. And in the second the defined voltage creates a large current in both L and C.
In your mechanical examples, if we first deflect the spring a finite amount, that is like charging the capacitor, and the amplitude (voltage) will never exceed this again. On the other hand, if you give the mass a velocity, that is equivalent to inserting a current in series with L and C and the current (velocity) will never exceed that value.
So it depends how you drive the oscillator and of course, as mentioned by russ_watters, it depends whether the question defines the force or speed of the generator or the energy stored in the system.
 
I think this is easiest solved using energy. Potential energy (PE) of the spring when compressed at (b) = KE of both objects at (c) = PE of spring + KE of sliding object in (d)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top