Help to understand fast adiabatic expansion

AI Thread Summary
In a discussion on fast adiabatic expansion, a participant seeks clarification on why the final temperature remains the same as the initial temperature after a gas expands into a vacuum, despite the ideal gas law suggesting a temperature decrease with increased volume. It is explained that while the volume increases, the pressure decreases, and this process is not isobaric, which affects the relationship between temperature and volume. The irreversible nature of rapid adiabatic expansion means that intermediate states lack well-defined variables, complicating the application of the ideal gas law. Instead, the first law of thermodynamics is emphasized, stating that in an adiabatic process, the change in internal energy equals the work done. Ultimately, understanding the first law clarifies the behavior of the gas during this expansion.
juanedilio
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am going through a book on thermal physics (specifically on a section on the 2nd Law)

It talks about an extremely fast adiabatic expression (as a gas in one flask separated by a valve to another flask in vacuum and then the valve is opened).

What I fail to understand is that once the valve is opened and the gas is allowed to reach equilibrium then the final temperature will be the same as the initial temperature (even though Q=0). The ideal gas law tells me that for an adiabatic process when volume increases the temperature must decrease.

Please help me in understanding why the temperature stays the same,

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
juanedilio said:
Hi,

I am going through a book on thermal physics (specifically on a section on the 2nd Law)

It talks about an extremely fast adiabatic expression (as a gas in one flask separated by a valve to another flask in vacuum and then the valve is opened).

What I fail to understand is that once the valve is opened and the gas is allowed to reach equilibrium then the final temperature will be the same as the initial temperature (even though Q=0). The ideal gas law tells me that for an adiabatic process when volume increases the temperature must decrease.

Please help me in understanding why the temperature stays the same,

Thanks
You mention that the ideal gas law states that temperature is proportional to volume, which is indeed correct. However, you should also note that temperature is proportional to pressure. So to say that an increase in volume results in a decrease in pressure is not technically correct, this is only the case during an isobaric process. In your thought experiment, the volume does indeed increase, but that pressure also decreased (i.e. the process is no isobaric). An important point to note here is that a rapid adiabatic expansion is irreversible, and as such, whilst we can apply the ideal gas law to the initial and final equilibrium states, we cannot do the same for any intermediate states since these states do not have very well defined state variables.

Noting that for an ideal gas, it's temperature is proportional to it's internal energy, it is perhaps more useful to move away from the ideal gas law and instead consider the first law of thermodynamics:

dU = dQ+dW

The problem states that the process is adiabatic and therefore the first term is zero, leaving us with:

dU = dW

So now what you have to ask yourself, is that whether or not the gas does any work on the surroundings?
 
Thanks for the response.

I guess I got to caught up in the ideal gas law before checking if the 1st law was met.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top