Help Understanding 3D Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Speedracer72
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reading
AI Thread Summary
Understanding the positivity and negativity of 3D coordinates relies on the defined orientation of the axes. Typically, in a right-handed coordinate system, the positive direction for the x-axis is to the right, the positive direction for the y-axis is upward, and the positive direction for the z-axis is out of the plane toward the observer. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clearly defining the axes in any graphical representation to avoid confusion. A visual aid is suggested to help clarify the spatial relationships between the axes. Properly interpreting these orientations is crucial for accurately determining the signs of coordinates in 3D space.
Speedracer72
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I am having help knowing when x,y,z are positive or negative. My graph looks something similar to this..

-------------z---------x
-------y

---------------------y

---x

--------------z

I am really confused as to when a location in all 3 axes is negative or positive in all x,y,z.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your diagram doesn't really explain what you are getting at. You might want to elaborate?
 
Well, i may not understand the question either.
See if this is on track -

it's the duty of the guy who's writing the book or article or drawing the chart to define his axes.

Let's start simple

IF you look at a map flat on your table,
most folks would agree East is positive direction in X,
and North is positive direction in Y,
and UP out of the map is positive direction in Z.

is that any help ??
 
Speedracer72 said:
Ok, so I am having help knowing when x,y,z are positive or negative. My graph looks something similar to this..

-------------z---------x
-------y

---------------------y

---x

--------------z

I am really confused as to when a location in all 3 axes is negative or positive in all x,y,z.

Welcome to the PF.

Maybe this is a better picture to start with. Can you use this picture to state your question a little more clearly?

http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbox/phased/ug/rh_coordinate.gif
http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbox/phased/ug/rh_coordinate.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top