alyks
- 7
- 0
Hi, I've been studying from Spivak's Calculus. Normally when I have trouble I can just search, but this time I can't find anything (you can tell how extensive this forum is in that I've been registered here for a while and this is my first post). On page 89, the book gives proof of the following:
If
|x - x_0| < \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right) and |y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}
Then
|xy - x_0y_0| < \epsilon
The proof shows this:
1. Since |x-x_0| < 1 we have |x| - |x_0| \leq |x-x_0| < 1 so that |x| < 1 + |x_0|
Thus,
2. |xy - x_0y_0| = |x(y-y_0) + y_0(x-x_0)|
3. \leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + |y_0| \cdot (|x - x_0|)
4. \leq (1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + |y_0| \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2}
Where I have a problem is in how he just assumes that \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right) is 1, when I saw the minimum I would have thought you'd do a proof by cases.
Then later, I have a hard time understanding how he went from line 3 to line 4. If |x| < 1 + |x_0| and |y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}, then only half of line four makes sense. Otherwise, I'm lost. Will anybody help me out?
If
|x - x_0| < \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right) and |y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}
Then
|xy - x_0y_0| < \epsilon
The proof shows this:
1. Since |x-x_0| < 1 we have |x| - |x_0| \leq |x-x_0| < 1 so that |x| < 1 + |x_0|
Thus,
2. |xy - x_0y_0| = |x(y-y_0) + y_0(x-x_0)|
3. \leq |x| \cdot |y - y_0| + |y_0| \cdot (|x - x_0|)
4. \leq (1 + |x_0|) \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)} + |y_0| \cdot \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2}
Where I have a problem is in how he just assumes that \text{min} \left (1, \frac{\epsilon}{2(|y_0| + 1)}\right) is 1, when I saw the minimum I would have thought you'd do a proof by cases.
Then later, I have a hard time understanding how he went from line 3 to line 4. If |x| < 1 + |x_0| and |y - y_0| < \frac{\epsilon}{2(|x_0| + 1)}, then only half of line four makes sense. Otherwise, I'm lost. Will anybody help me out?